Literature DB >> 18335499

High-resolution genomic and expression analyses of copy number alterations in breast tumors.

Peter M Haverty1, Jane Fridlyand, Li Li, Gad Getz, Rameen Beroukhim, Scott Lohr, Thomas D Wu, Guy Cavet, Zemin Zhang, John Chant.   

Abstract

Analysis of recurrent DNA amplification can lead to the identification of cancer driver genes, but this process is often hampered by the low resolution of existing copy number analysis platforms. Fifty-one breast tumors were profiled for copy number alterations (CNAs) with the high-resolution Affymetrix 500K SNP array. These tumors were also expression-profiled and surveyed for mutations in selected genes commonly mutated in breast cancer (TP53, CDKN2A, ERBB2, KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN). Combined analysis of common CNAs and mutations revealed putative associations between features. Analysis of both the prevalence and amplitude of CNAs defined regions of recurrent alteration. Compared with previous array comparative genomic hybridization studies, our analysis provided boundaries for frequently altered regions that were approximately one-fourth the size, greatly reducing the number of potential alteration-driving genes. Expression data from matched tumor samples were used to further interrogate the functional relevance of genes located in recurrent amplicons. Although our data support the importance of some known driver genes such as ERBB2, refined amplicon boundaries at other locations, such as 8p11-12 and 11q13.5-q14.2, greatly reduce the number of potential driver genes and indicate alternatives to commonly suggested driver genes in some cases. For example, the previously reported recurrent amplification at 17q23.2 is reduced to a 249 kb minimal region containing the putative driver RPS6KB1 as well as the putative oncogenic microRNA mir-21. High-resolution copy number analysis provides refined insight into many breast cancer amplicons and their relationships to gene expression, point mutations and breast cancer subtype classifications. This article contains Supplementary Material available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1045-2257/suppmat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18335499     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  79 in total

1.  ACNE: a summarization method to estimate allele-specific copy numbers for Affymetrix SNP arrays.

Authors:  Maria Ortiz-Estevez; Henrik Bengtsson; Angel Rubio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genome-wide Mapping of Copy Number Variations Using SNP Arrays.

Authors:  Daniel Nowak; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  NIRF constitutes a nodal point in the cell cycle network and is a candidate tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Tsutomu Mori; Daisuke D Ikeda; Toshihiko Fukushima; Seiichi Takenoshita; Hideo Kochi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  The Deleted in Liver Cancer 1 (Dlc1) tumor suppressor is haploinsufficient for mammary gland development and epithelial cell polarity.

Authors:  Pratima Basak; Rachelle Dillon; Heather Leslie; Afshin Raouf; Michael R A Mowat
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  p85 Associates with unphosphorylated PTEN and the PTEN-associated complex.

Authors:  Rosalia Rabinovsky; Panisa Pochanard; Chontelle McNear; Saskia M Brachmann; Jonathan S Duke-Cohan; Levi A Garraway; William R Sellers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Genomic imbalances in esophageal carcinoma cell lines involve Wnt pathway genes.

Authors:  Jacqueline Brown; Hannelie Bothma; Robin Veale; Pascale Willem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicholas Navin; Alexander Krasnitz; Linda Rodgers; Kerry Cook; Jennifer Meth; Jude Kendall; Michael Riggs; Yvonne Eberling; Jennifer Troge; Vladimir Grubor; Dan Levy; Pär Lundin; Susanne Månér; Anders Zetterberg; James Hicks; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Copy number abnormalities in sporadic canine colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Shoshona Le; Liang Sun; Xiuzhen Yan; Mucheng Zhang; Jennifer Macleod; Bruce Leroy; Nicole Northrup; Angela Ellis; Timothy J Yeatman; Yanchun Liang; Michael E Zwick; Shaying Zhao
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Integrated analysis of homozygous deletions, focal amplifications, and sequence alterations in breast and colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca J Leary; Jimmy C Lin; Jordan Cummins; Simina Boca; Laura D Wood; D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Tobias Sjöblom; Ben-Ho Park; Ramon Parsons; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; James K V Willson; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Levy Kopelovich; Nick Papadopoulos; Len A Pennacchio; Tian-Li Wang; Sanford D Markowitz; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Authors:  Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.