Literature DB >> 24383459

Family matters: effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision-making.

Christopher T Su1, Ryan D McMahan, Brie A Williams, Rashmi K Sharma, Rebecca L Sudore.   

Abstract

Cultural attitudes about medical decision-making and filial expectations may lead some surrogates to experience stress and family conflict. Thirteen focus groups with racially and ethnically diverse English and Spanish speakers from county and Veterans Affairs hospitals, senior centers, and cancer support groups were conducted to describe participants' experiences making serious or end-of-life decisions for others. Filial expectations and family dynamics related to birth order and surrogate decision-making were explored using qualitative, thematic content analysis, and overarching themes from focus group transcripts were identified. The mean age of the 69 participants was 69 ± 14, and 29% were African American, 26% were white, 26% were Asian or Pacific Islander, and 19% were Latino. Seventy percent of participants engaged in unprompted discussions about birth order and family dynamics. Six subthemes were identified within three overarching categories: communication (unspoken expectations and discussion of death as taboo), emotion (emotional stress and feelings of loneliness), and conflict (family conflict and potential solutions to prevent conflict). These findings suggest that birth order and family dynamics can have profound effects on surrogate stress and coping. Clinicians should be aware of potential unspoken filial expectations for firstborns and help facilitate communication between the patient, surrogate, and extended family to reduce stress and conflict. © Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advance care planning; aging; birth order; decision-making; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24383459      PMCID: PMC4130561          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  30 in total

1.  End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals.

Authors:  K E Rosenfeld; N S Wenger; M Kagawa-Singer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Advance care planning.

Authors:  Muriel R Gillick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies.

Authors:  Richard Schulz; Lynn M Martire
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  Advance directives for medical care--a case for greater use.

Authors:  L L Emanuel; M J Barry; J D Stoeckle; L M Ettelson; E J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Quality of life while dying: a qualitative study of terminally ill older men.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Vig; Robert A Pearlman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Acculturation of attitudes toward end-of-life care: a cross-cultural survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese.

Authors:  Shinji Matsumura; Seiji Bito; Honghu Liu; Katharine Kahn; Shunichi Fukuhara; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Neil Wenger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates.

Authors:  Ryan D McMahan; Sara J Knight; Terri R Fried; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Caregiver burden and unmet patient needs.

Authors:  K Siegel; V H Raveis; P Houts; V Mor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Economic, political and ethnic influences on end-of-life decision-making: a decade in review.

Authors:  Marjorie E Baker
Journal:  J Health Soc Policy       Date:  2002

10.  Supporting family caregivers at the end of life: "they don't know what they don't know".

Authors:  Michael W Rabow; Joshua M Hauser; Jocelia Adams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  11 in total

1.  Symptom Assessment Solutions for In-Home Supportive Services and Diverse Older Adults: A Roadmap for Change.

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Mary T Katen; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Christine S Ritchie; Shireen McSpadden; Mark Burns; Aiesha M Volow; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Request for organ donation without donor registration: a qualitative study of the perspectives of bereaved relatives.

Authors:  Jack de Groot; Maria van Hoek; Cornelia Hoedemaekers; Andries Hoitsma; Hans Schilderman; Wim Smeets; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Evert van Leeuwen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Surrogate Decision Makers Need Better Preparation for Their Role: Advice from Experienced Surrogates.

Authors:  Brian M Bakke; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Deborah E Barnes; Brookelle Li; Aiesha M Volow; Jana Powell; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Ethical frameworks for surrogates' end-of-life planning experiences.

Authors:  Hyejin Kim; Janet A Deatrick; Connie M Ulrich
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 5.  Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Decision Making for Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Andrew S Epstein
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.315

6.  Older Adult and Surrogate Perspectives on Serious, Difficult, and Important Medical Decisions.

Authors:  Laura A Petrillo; Ryan D McMahan; Victoria Tang; Daniel Dohan; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Effect of Advance Care Planning on Surrogate Decision Makers' Preparedness for Decision Making: Results of a Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thiede; Benjamin H Levi; Daniella Lipnick; Rhonda Johnson; In Seo La; Erik B Lehman; Theresa Smith; Debra Wiegand; Michael Green; Lauren Jodi Van Scoy
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults.

Authors:  Lee A Lindquist; Ruqayyah Muhammad; Amber P Miller-Winder; Lauren Opsasnick; Kwang-Youn Kim; Julia Yoshino Benavente; Michael Wolf; Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-03-16

9.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prostate Cancer Survivors' Perceived Engagement in Treatment Decision-Making.

Authors:  Nynikka R Palmer; Steven E Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Jane Jih; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-03-07

Review 10.  A conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to primary clinical teams requesting pediatric palliative care consultation based upon a narrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; Douglas L Hill; Concetta DiDomenico; Shefali Parikh; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.