Literature DB >> 29516434

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prostate Cancer Survivors' Perceived Engagement in Treatment Decision-Making.

Nynikka R Palmer1, Steven E Gregorich2, Jennifer Livaudais-Toman2, Jane Jih2, Celia P Kaplan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined prostate cancer patients' perceived engagement in treatment decision-making and associated factors by race/ethnicity in a multiethnic sample.
METHOD: We identified patients through the California Cancer Registry. Patients completed a cross-sectional telephone interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by race/ethnicity, estimated the associations of patient demographic and health status characteristics on (1) doctor asked patient to help decide treatment plan and (2) patient and doctor worked out a treatment plan together.
RESULTS: We included 855 prostate cancer patients: African American (19%), Asian American (15%), Latino (24%), and White (42%). Asian American patients were less likely than White patients to report that their doctors asked them to help decide a treatment plan (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.18-0.53) and that they worked out a treatment plan with their doctors (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.33-0.90). Language of interview was a significant contributing factor in stratified analysis for both outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Asian American prostate cancer patients reported less engagement in treatment decision-making, with Chinese language being a significant contributing factor. Future research should identify patient-centered strategies that effectively engage underserved patients and support healthcare providers in shared decision-making with multiethnic and multilingual patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparities; Engagement; Men; Prostate cancer; Treatment decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29516434      PMCID: PMC6526935          DOI: 10.1007/s40615-018-0475-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities        ISSN: 2196-8837


  56 in total

1.  Advancing research in transitional care: challenges of culture, language and health literacy in Asian American and native Hawaiian elders.

Authors:  Christy Nishita; Colette Browne
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-02

2.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Race, ethnicity, and shared decision making for hyperlipidemia and hypertension treatment: the DECISIONS survey.

Authors:  Neda Ratanawongsa; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Mick P Couper; John Van Hoewyk; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?

Authors:  Arun Mallapareddi; Julie Ruterbusch; Elyse Reamer; Susan Eggly; Jinping Xu
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Rosalia Viterbo; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Eric M Horwitz; Michael L Blute; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

8.  Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Edward Guadagnoli; Mary Beth Landrum; Catherine Borbas; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Erin L Mead; Ardith Z Doorenbos; Sara H Javid; Emily A Haozous; Lori Arviso Alvord; David R Flum; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The ProCaSP study: quality of life outcomes of prostate cancer patients after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy in a cohort study.

Authors:  Nora Eisemann; Sandra Nolte; Maike Schnoor; Alexander Katalinic; Volker Rohde; Annika Waldmann
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  3 in total

1.  Understanding shared decision-making experience among vulnerable population: Focus group with food bank clients.

Authors:  Young Ji Lee; Tiffany Brazile; Francesca Galbiati; Megan Hamm; Cindy Bryce; Sandeep Jain; Jennifer Kraschnewski; Kathleen McTigue
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 2.  Improving Shared Decision Making in Latino Men With Prostate Cancer: A Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Joaquin Michel; Jorge Ballon; Sarah E Connor; David C Johnson; Jonathan Bergman; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin; Dana L Alden
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2021-05-27

3.  Prostate cancer patients' self-reported participation in research: an examination of racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Nynikka R Palmer; Hala T Borno; Steven E Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.