Jack de Groot1,2, Maria van Hoek3, Cornelia Hoedemaekers4, Andries Hoitsma5, Hans Schilderman6, Wim Smeets3,7, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen3,8, Evert van Leeuwen3. 1. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, DGVP 20, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Jack.deGroot@radboudumc.nl. 2. Department of Spiritual and Pastoral Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Jack.deGroot@radboudumc.nl. 3. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, DGVP 20, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 6. Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Spiritual and Pastoral Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 8. Kalorama Foundation, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, consent from relatives is obligatory for post mortal donation. This study explored the perspectives of relatives regarding the request for consent for donation in cases without donor registration. METHODS: A content analysis of narratives of 24 bereaved relatives (14 in-depth interviews and one letter) of unregistered, eligible, brain-dead donors was performed. RESULTS: Relatives of unregistered, brain-dead patients usually refuse consent for donation, even if they harbour pro-donation attitudes themselves, or knew that the deceased favoured organ donation. Half of those who refused consent for donation mentioned afterwards that it could have been an option. The decision not to consent to donation is attributed to contextual factors, such as feeling overwhelmed by the notification of death immediately followed by the request; not being accustomed to speaking about death; inadequate support from other relatives or healthcare professionals, and lengthy procedures. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals could provide better support to relatives prior to donation requests, address their informational needs and adapt their message to individual circumstances. It is anticipated that the number of consenting families could be enlarged by examining the experience of decoupling and offering the possibility of consent for donation after circulatory death if families refuse consent for donation after brain-death.
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, consent from relatives is obligatory for post mortal donation. This study explored the perspectives of relatives regarding the request for consent for donation in cases without donor registration. METHODS: A content analysis of narratives of 24 bereaved relatives (14 in-depth interviews and one letter) of unregistered, eligible, brain-dead donors was performed. RESULTS: Relatives of unregistered, brain-dead patients usually refuse consent for donation, even if they harbour pro-donation attitudes themselves, or knew that the deceased favoured organ donation. Half of those who refused consent for donation mentioned afterwards that it could have been an option. The decision not to consent to donation is attributed to contextual factors, such as feeling overwhelmed by the notification of death immediately followed by the request; not being accustomed to speaking about death; inadequate support from other relatives or healthcare professionals, and lengthy procedures. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals could provide better support to relatives prior to donation requests, address their informational needs and adapt their message to individual circumstances. It is anticipated that the number of consenting families could be enlarged by examining the experience of decoupling and offering the possibility of consent for donation after circulatory death if families refuse consent for donation after brain-death.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision making by proxies; Donor registration; Ethics; Informational needs; Organ transplantation; Professional-family relations
Authors: Yorick J de Groot; Hester F Lingsma; Mathieu van der Jagt; Jan Bakker; Jan N M Ijzermans; Erwin J O Kompanje Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nancy Kentish-Barnes; L A Siminoff; W Walker; M Urbanski; J Charpentier; M Thuong; A Sarti; S D Shemie; E Azoulay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jacob Crawshaw; Justin Presseau; Zack van Allen; Livia Pinheiro Carvalho; Kim Jordison; Shane English; Dean A Fergusson; Francois Lauzier; Alexis F Turgeon; Aimee J Sarti; Claudio Martin; Frédérick D'Aragon; Alvin Ho-Ting Li; Greg Knoll; Ian Ball; Jamie Brehaut; Karen E A Burns; Marie-Chantal Fortin; Matthew Weiss; Maureen Meade; Pierre Marsolais; Sam Shemie; Sanabelle Zaabat; Sonny Dhanani; Simon C Kitto; Michaël Chassé Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jorge S López; Maria Soria-Oliver; Begoña Aramayona; Rubén García-Sánchez; José M Martínez; María J Martín Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2018-04-10