Literature DB >> 24382697

The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery.

Marah N Short1, Thomas A Aloia, Vivian Ho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is widely known that outcomes after cancer surgery vary widely, depending on interactions between patient, tumor, neoadjuvant therapy, and provider factors. Within this complex milieu, the influence of complications on the cost of surgical oncology care remains unknown. The authors examined rates of Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) occurrence for 6 cancer operations and their association with costs of care.
METHODS: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) PSI definitions were used to identify patient safety-related complications in Medicare claims data. Hospital and inpatient physician claims for the years 2005 through 2009 were analyzed for 6 cancer resections: colectomy, rectal resection, pulmonary lobectomy, pneumonectomy, esophagectomy, and pancreatic resection. Risk-adjusted regression analyses were used to measure the association between each PSI and hospitalization costs.
RESULTS: Overall PSI rates ranged from a low of 0.01% for postoperative hip fracture to a high of 2.58% for respiratory failure. Death among inpatients with serious treatable complications, postoperative respiratory failure, postoperative thromboembolism, and accidental puncture/laceration were >1% for all 6 cancer operations. Several PSIs-including decubitus ulcer, death among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications, and postoperative thromboembolism-raised hospitalization costs by ≥20% for most cancer surgery types. Postoperative respiratory failure resulted in a cost increase >50% for all cancer resections.
CONCLUSIONS: The consistently higher costs associated with cancer surgery PSIs indicate that substantial health care savings could be achieved by targeting these indicators for quality improvement.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; complication; cost analysis; patient safety; quality indicators; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24382697      PMCID: PMC3961514          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

1.  Technological development and medical productivity: the diffusion of angioplasty in New York state.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Robert S Huckman
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Learning and the evolution of medical technologies: the diffusion of coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  Vivian Ho
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Wissam J Halabi; Ruihong Luo; Alessio Pigazzi; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08

4.  Using Medicaid to buy private health insurance--the great new experiment?

Authors:  Sara Rosenbaum; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Excess costs attributable to postoperative complications.

Authors:  Kathleen Carey; Theodore Stefos; Ann M Borzecki; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; William B Weeks; Raj J Karia; Smita Das; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Thomas Aloia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives?

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Peter J Pronovost; John A Cowan; Pamela A Lipsett
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Patient safety outcomes in small urban and small rural hospitals.

Authors:  Smruti Vartak; Marcia M Ward; Thomas E Vaughn
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Volume-outcome relation for acute appendicitis: evidence from a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Po-Li Wei; Shih-Ping Liu; Joseph J Keller; Herng-Ching Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Fabian M Johnston; Howard Nelson-Williams; Marcelo Cerullo; Mary E Dillhoff; Carl R Schmidt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Assessment of health care cost for complex surgical patients: review of cost, re-imbursement and revenue involved in pancreatic surgery at a high-volume academic medical centre.

Authors:  Swapnil D Kachare; Kendall R Liner; Nasreen A Vohra; Emmanuel E Zervos; Todd Hickey; Timothy L Fitzgerald
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Implications of Hospital Volume on Costs Following Esophagectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Gregory T Kennedy; Benjamin D Ukert; Jarrod D Predina; Andrew D Newton; John C Kucharczuk; Daniel Polsky; Sunil Singhal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: A value-based comparison.

Authors:  Onkar V Khullar; Renjian Jiang; Seth D Force; Allan Pickens; Manu S Sancheti; Kevin Ward; Theresa Gillespie; Felix G Fernandez
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Sutton; Gregory C Wilson; Ian M Paquette; Koffi Wima; Dennis J Hanseman; R Cutler Quillin; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Syed A Ahmad; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Hospital costs of complications after a pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Trientje B Santema; Annelies Visser; Olivier R C Busch; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; J Carel Goslings; D J Gouma; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Temporary vs. permanent stoma: factors associated with the development of complications and costs for rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Iktej S Jabbal; Aaron C Spaulding; Riccardo Lemini; Shalmali R Borkar; Krystof Stanek; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Association of Hospital Market Concentration With Costs of Complex Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo Cerullo; Sophia Y Chen; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Joseph K Canner; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Comparison of Clinical Data Between Patients With Complications and Without Complications After Spinal Tuberculosis Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Liyi Chen; Chong Liu; Zhen Ye; Wuhua Chen; Xuhua Sun; Jiarui Chen; Hao Li; Tuo Liang; Shengsheng Huang; Jie Jiang; Tianyou Chen; Hao Guo; Yuanlin Yao; Shian Liao; Chaojie Yu; Shaofeng Wu; Binguang Fan; Xinli Zhan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-29

10.  Incidence, outcome, and attributable resource use associated with pulmonary and cardiac complications after major small and large bowel procedures.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Walter T Linde-Zwirble
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.