Literature DB >> 22508667

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a better look into the latest trends.

Celeste Y Kang1, Wissam J Halabi, Ruihong Luo, Alessio Pigazzi, Ninh T Nguyen, Michael J Stamos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The latest trends of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) after the introduction of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision laparoscopic procedure codes in 2008 remains unknown. This study evaluates LCRS trends before and after the application of specific codes for LCRS.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of elective surgery for colon cancer, rectal cancer, and diverticulitis using Nationwide Inpatient Sample data from 2007 and 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome measures included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total charge.
RESULTS: A total of 126 921 patients in 2007 and 117 177 patients in 2009 underwent colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery increased dramatically from 13.8% in 2007 to 42.6% in 2009 (P.01). This trendwas disease and procedure specific. When compared with 2007, patients who underwent LCRS in 2009 had lower conversion rates (14.8% vs 32.1%, P.001). In 2009, LCRS had lower in-hospital mortality (0.5% vs 1.1%, P.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (5 vs 6 days, P.001) compared with open surgery. In 2009, when compared with successful LCRS, conversion to open surgery was associated with a longer length of hospital stay (6 vs 5 days, P.01), increased hospital charges, and increased mortality (0.7% vs 0.5%, P.01).
CONCLUSION: The marked increase in LCRS when comparing these 2 years is unlikely only due to the changing practice of colorectal surgery but brings into question the accuracy of data prior to 2009. Our report of Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009 data represents the most accurate reflection of the use of LCRS in the United States. These data can serve as a benchmark for future comparative studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22508667     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  38 in total

1.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis.

Authors:  Mark H Hanna; Grace S Hwang; Michael J Phelan; Thanh-Lan Bui; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven D Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Fabrizio Luca; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Sabina Cenciarelli; Wanda Petz; Igor Monsellato; Manuela Valvo; Maria Laura Cossu; Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Kassem Shmaissany
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zheng; Ahmedin Jemal; Chun Chieh Lin; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Christopher W Macomber; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; W Brian Sweeney; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Heena P Santry; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using the Medrobotics Flex® System.

Authors:  Heather Carmichael; Anthony P D'Andrea; Matthew Skancke; Vincent Obias; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.

Authors:  Wissam J Halabi; Celeste Y Kang; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A nationwide analysis of the use and outcomes of epidural analgesia in open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Wissam J Halabi; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Boris Vestweber; Karl-Heinz Vestweber; Claudia Paul; Andreas D Rink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients.

Authors:  Neel Maria Helvind; Jens Ravn Eriksen; Anders Mogensen; Buket Tas; Jesper Olsen; Mads Bundgaard; Henrik Loft Jakobsen; Ismail Gögenür
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.