| Literature DB >> 24380926 |
Jian-Guo Bau1, Taipau Chia2, Yu-Fang Chung3, Kun-Hao Chen4, Shyi-Kuen Wu5.
Abstract
Flexibility testing is one of the most important fitness assessments. It is generally evaluated by measuring the range of motion (RoM) of body segments around a joint center. This study presents a novel assessment of flexibility in the microcirculatory aspect. Eighteen college students were recruited for the flexibility assessment. The flexibility of the leg was defined according to the angle of active ankle dorsiflexion measured by goniometry. Six legs were excluded, and the remaining thirty legs were categorized into two groups, group H (n = 15 with higher flexibility) and group L (n = 15 with lower flexibility), according to their RoM. The microcirculatory signals of the gastrocnemius muscle on the belly were monitored by using Laser-Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) with a noninvasive skin probe. Three indices of nonpulsatile component (DC), pulsatile component (AC) and perfusion pulsatility (PP) were defined from the LDF signals after signal processing. The results revealed that both the DC and AC values of the group H that demonstrated higher stability underwent muscle stretching. In contrast, these indices of group L had interferences and became unstable during muscle stretching. The PP value of group H was a little higher than that of group L. These primary findings help us to understand the microcirculatory physiology of flexibility, and warrant further investigations for use of non-invasive LDF techniques in the assessment of flexibility.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24380926 PMCID: PMC3926570 DOI: 10.3390/s140100478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Characteristics of the subjects grouped by Active RoM of ankle dorsiflexion, expressed in mean (SD).
| Weight (kg) | 53.7 ± 9.4 | 59.4 ± 9.8 | 0.12 |
| Height (cm) | 165.7 ± 7.3 | 167.8 ± 8.2 | 0.47 |
| BMI | 19.5 ± 2.7 | 21.0 ± 2.4 | 0.13 |
|
| |||
| Active RoM of ankle | 20.3 ± 4.2 | 11.0 ± 3.6 | <0.0001 |
Figure 1.The measurement system, the location of the measurement site of microvascular perfusion, and active gastrocnemius muscle stretching with ankle dorsiflexion.
Figure 2.Six measurements in the experimental protocol schedule. Muscle was in relaxed states during BL, R1, R2 and R3, whereas AS1 and AS2 were the stretching states.
Figure 3.The typical blood flow signal determined by LDF (blue), plotted together with ECG signal (red).
Figure 4.The definitions of DC and AC components of mean LDF waveform derived from segments of LDF signals.
Figure 5.(a) The nonpulsatile (DC) component of the blood perfusion on gastrocnemius muscle in the higher flexibility group (group H: ) and the lower flexibility group (group L: ); n = 16. (b) The pulsatile (AC) component of the blood perfusion on gastrocnemius muscle in both group H and group L. (c) The PP values (AC to DC ratio) of the blood perfusion in the two groups. * Statistical significant at a level <0.05, **<0.01.
The p-value of inter-group variation.
| 0.3483 | 0.7195 | 0.4514 | 0.6363 | 0.4027 | 0.4995 | |
| 0.6206 | 0.7444 | 0.7733 | 0.6519 | 0.6039 | 0.9333 | |
| 0.4160 | 0.7554 | 0.5153 | 0.5383 | 0.4643 | 0.3671 |