| Literature DB >> 24380558 |
Corrado Chiappa1, Francesca Rovera1, Adriana Dionigi Corben2, Anna Fachinetti1, Valentina De Berardinis1, Valentina Marchionini1, Stefano Rausei3, Luigi Boni3, Gianlorenzo Dionigi3, Renzo Dionigi3.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common tumor affecting women worldwide. Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) followed by irradiation nowadays is the treatment of choice for early-stage disease; there is no difference in long-term survival between mastectomy and BCT combined with external radiotherapy. A positive margin is associated with increased risk of local recurrences after BCT for invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. The exact definition of an adequate surgical margin after breast cancer resection has long been debated among physicians and represents an area of considerable variation in clinical practice. There is a lack of standardization in the pathology methods of margin evaluation, which yields little consensus regarding what constitutes an adequate negative margin. As a consequence, patient management varies widely based on the threshold that surgeons accept for adequate margins and the subsequent need for re-excision. We analyze and discuss recent literature about this topic both from the pathological and from the surgical point of view.Entities:
Keywords: Breast conservative therapy; Breast surgery; Surgical margins
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24380558 DOI: 10.1016/S1743-9191(13)60021-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg ISSN: 1743-9159 Impact factor: 6.071