Literature DB >> 24378251

MammaPrint molecular diagnostics on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Anna Sapino1, Paul Roepman2, Sabine C Linn3, Mireille H J Snel2, Leonie J M J Delahaye4, Jeroen van den Akker4, Annuska M Glas4, Iris M Simon2, Neil Barth5, Femke A de Snoo6, Laura J van 't Veer2, Luca Molinaro7, Els M J J Berns8, Jelle Wesseling9, Lee B Riley10, David Anderson11, Bichlien Nguyen12, Charles E Cox13.   

Abstract

MammaPrint, a prognostic 70-gene profile for early-stage breast cancer, has been available for fresh tissue. Improvements in RNA processing have enabled microarray diagnostics for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Here, we describe method optimization, validation, and performance of MammaPrint using analyte from FFPE tissue. Laboratory procedures for enabling the assay to be run on FFPE tissue were determined using 157 samples, and the assay was established using 125 matched FFPE and fresh tissues. Validation of MammaPrint-FFPE, compared with MammaPrint-fresh, was performed on an independent series of matched tissue from five hospitals (n = 211). Reproducibility, repeatability, and precision of the FFPE assay (n = 87) was established for duplicate analysis of the same tumor, interlaboratory performance, 20-day repeat experiments, and repeated analyses over 12 months. FFPE sample processing had a success rate of 97%. The MammaPrint assay using FFPE analyte demonstrated an overall equivalence of 91.5% (95% confidence interval, 86.9% to 94.5%) between the 211 independent matched FFPE and fresh tumor samples. Precision was 97.3%, and repeatability was 97.8%, with highly reproducible results between replicate samples of the same tumor and between two laboratories (concordance, 96%). Thus, with 580 tumor samples, MammaPrint was successfully translated to FFPE tissue. The assay has high precision and reproducibility, and FFPE results are substantially equivalent to results derived from fresh tissue.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24378251     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  32 in total

1.  Histomorphological and Molecular Assessments of the Fixation Times Comparing Formalin and Ethanol-Based Fixatives.

Authors:  Joon-Yong Chung; Joon Seon Song; Kris Ylaya; John D Sears; Lauren Choi; Hanbyoul Cho; Avi Z Rosenberg; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 2.  Genome-based risk prediction for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Christina Adaniel; Komal Jhaveri; Adriana Heguy; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-09-03

Review 3.  Diagnostic tests based on gene expression profile in breast cancer: from background to clinical use.

Authors:  Laura Zanotti; Alberto Bottini; Camillo Rossi; Daniele Generali; Maria Rosa Cappelletti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-23

4.  Assessment of PD-L1 expression across breast cancer molecular subtypes, in relation to mutation rate, BRCA1-like status, tumor-infiltrating immune cells and survival.

Authors:  Marcelo Sobral-Leite; Koen Van de Vijver; Magali Michaut; Rianne van der Linden; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Hugo M Horlings; Tesa M Severson; Anna Marie Mulligan; Nayana Weerasooriya; Joyce Sanders; Annuska M Glas; Diederik Wehkamp; Lorenza Mittempergher; Kelly Kersten; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Dennis Peters; Erik Hooijberg; Annegien Broeks; Marc J van de Vijver; Rene Bernards; Irene L Andrulis; Marleen Kok; Karin E de Visser; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Transferring MINDACT to Daily Routine: Implementation of the 70-Gene Signature in Luminal Early Breast Cancer - Results from a Prospective Registry of the Austrian Group Medical Tumor Therapy (AGMT).

Authors:  Theresa Westphal; Simon P Gampenrieder; Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Marija Balic; Florian Posch; Nadia Dandachi; Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Roland Reitsamer; Karl Sotlar; Bianca Radl; Christoph Suppan; Herbert Stöger; Richard Greil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Clinical Validation of BCT Scores With Prognostic Factors in Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Ji-Young Park; Ho Yong Park; Jin Hyang Jung; Wan Wook Kim; Chan Sub Park; Ryu Kyung Lee; Jee Young Park; Yee Soo Chae; Soo Jung Lee; Hye Jung Kim
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Genomic Testing in the Management of Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sima Ehsani; Kari Braun Wisinski
Journal:  J Clin Outcomes Manag       Date:  2017-05

9.  MammaPrint and BluePrint comprehensively capture the cancer hallmarks in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Josien C Haan; Rajith Bhaskaran; Architha Ellappalayam; Yannick Bijl; Christian J Griffioen; Ersan Lujinovic; William M Audeh; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Lorenza Mittempergher; Annuska M Glas
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.263

Review 10.  Navigating the rapids: the development of regulated next-generation sequencing-based clinical trial assays and companion diagnostics.

Authors:  Saumya Pant; Russell Weiner; Matthew J Marton
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.