Sima Ehsani1, Kari Braun Wisinski2. 1. University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ. 2. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center and School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Dr. Wisinski).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe common genomic tests being used clinically to assess prognosis and guide adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy decisions for early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: Case presentation and review of the literature. RESULTS: Hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancers, which express the estrogen and/or progesterone receptor, account for the majority of breast cancers. Endocrine therapy can be highly effective for patients with these HR-positive tumors, and identification of HR-positive breast cancers that do not require the addition of chemotherapy is critical. Clinicopathological features of the breast cancer, including tumor size, nodal involvement, grading, and HR status, are insufficient in predicting the risk for recurrence or the need for chemotherapy. Furthermore, a portion of HR-positive breast cancers have an ongoing risk for late recurrence, and longer durations of endocrine therapy are being used to reduce this risk. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence for use of genomic testing in early-stage HR-positive breast cancer to aid in chemotherapy recommendations. Further confirmation of genomic assays for prediction of benefit from prolonged endocrine therapy is needed.
OBJECTIVES: To describe common genomic tests being used clinically to assess prognosis and guide adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy decisions for early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: Case presentation and review of the literature. RESULTS: Hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancers, which express the estrogen and/or progesterone receptor, account for the majority of breast cancers. Endocrine therapy can be highly effective for patients with these HR-positive tumors, and identification of HR-positive breast cancers that do not require the addition of chemotherapy is critical. Clinicopathological features of the breast cancer, including tumor size, nodal involvement, grading, and HR status, are insufficient in predicting the risk for recurrence or the need for chemotherapy. Furthermore, a portion of HR-positive breast cancers have an ongoing risk for late recurrence, and longer durations of endocrine therapy are being used to reduce this risk. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient evidence for use of genomic testing in early-stage HR-positive breast cancer to aid in chemotherapy recommendations. Further confirmation of genomic assays for prediction of benefit from prolonged endocrine therapy is needed.
Authors: A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: W Eiermann; S Paepke; J Appfelstaedt; A Llombart-Cussac; J Eremin; J Vinholes; L Mauriac; M Ellis; M Lassus; H A Chaudri-Ross; M Dugan; M Borgs Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Martin Filipits; Torsten O Nielsen; Margaretha Rudas; Richard Greil; Herbert Stöger; Raimund Jakesz; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Otto Dietze; Peter Regitnig; Christine Gruber-Rossipal; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Christian F Singer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Peter Dubsky; Thomas Bauernhofer; Michael Hubalek; Michael Knauer; Harald Trapl; Christian Fesl; Carl Schaper; Sean Ferree; Shuzhen Liu; J Wayne Cowens; Michael Gnant Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yi Zhang; Catherine A Schnabel; Brock E Schroeder; Piiha-Lotta Jerevall; Rachel C Jankowitz; Tommy Fornander; Olle Stål; Adam M Brufsky; Dennis Sgroi; Mark G Erlander Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Laurel A Habel; Steven Shak; Marlena K Jacobs; Angela Capra; Claire Alexander; Mylan Pho; Joffre Baker; Michael Walker; Drew Watson; James Hackett; Noelle T Blick; Deborah Greenberg; Louis Fehrenbacher; Bryan Langholz; Charles P Quesenberry Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2006-05-31 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Dennis C Sgroi; Ivana Sestak; Jack Cuzick; Yi Zhang; Catherine A Schnabel; Brock Schroeder; Mark G Erlander; Anita Dunbier; Kally Sidhu; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Paul E Goss; Mitch Dowsett Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mitch Dowsett; Ivana Sestak; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Kalvinder Sidhu; Anita K Dunbier; J Wayne Cowens; Sean Ferree; James Storhoff; Carl Schaper; Jack Cuzick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544