Literature DB >> 24377036

Comparison of dose distribution in IMRT and RapidArc technique in prostate radiotherapy.

Wojciech Leszczyński1, Krzysztof Slosarek1, Marta Szlag1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim was to provide a dosimetric comparison between IMRT and RapidArc treatment plans with RPI index with simultaneous comparison of the treatment delivery time.
BACKGROUND: IMRT and RapidArc provide highly conformal dose distribution with good sparing of normal tissues. However, a complex spatial dosimetry of IMRT and RapidArc plans hampers the evaluation and comparison between plans calculated for the two modalities. RPI was used in this paper for treatment plan comparisons. The duration of the therapeutic session in RapidArc is reported to be shorter in comparison to therapeutic time of the other dynamic techniques. For this reasons, total treatment delivery time in both techniques was compared and discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients with prostate carcinoma were randomly selected for the analysis. Two competitive treatment plans using respectively the IMRT and RapidArc techniques were computed for each patient in Eclipse planning system v. 8.6.15. RPIwin(®) application was used for RPI calculations for each treatment plan. Additionally, total treatment time was compared between IMRT and RapidArc plans. Total treatment time was a sum of monitor units (MU) for each treated field.
RESULTS: The mean values of the RPI indices were insignificantly higher for IMRT plans in comparison to rotational therapy. Comparison of the mean numbers of monitor units confirmed that the use of rotational technique instead of conventional static field IMRT can significantly reduce the treatment time.
CONCLUSION: Analysis presented in this paper, demonstrated that RapidArc can compete with the IMRT technique in the field of treatment plan dosimetry reducing the time required for dose delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arc therapy; IMRT; Quality indices; Treatment plan comparisons

Year:  2012        PMID: 24377036      PMCID: PMC3863253          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT.

Authors:  Pengpeng Zhang; Laura Happersett; Yingli Yang; Yoshiya Yamada; Gig Mageras; Margie Hunt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Conformity index: a review.

Authors:  Loïc Feuvret; Georges Noël; Jean-Jacques Mazeron; Pierre Bey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Q Jackie Wu; W Robert Lee; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study.

Authors:  Wilko F A R Verbakel; Johan P Cuijpers; Daan Hoffmans; Michael Bieker; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A study on conventional IMRT and RapidArc treatment planning techniques for head and neck cancers.

Authors:  S A Syam Kumar; Nagarajan Vivekanandan; Padmanaban Sriram
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-03-03
  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Ramachandran Prabhakar; Milind Kumar; Suja Cheruliyil; Silpa Jayakumar; Satheesan Balasubramanian; Jim Cramb
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-04-28

2.  Empirical estimation of beam-on time for prostate cancer patients treated on Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Małgorzata Skórska; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-02-04

3.  Comparison of dosimetric variation between prostate IMRT and VMAT due to patient's weight loss: Patient and phantom study.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Runqing Jiang
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-06-25

4.  Integral dose: Comparison between four techniques for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ślosarek; Wojciech Osewski; Aleksandra Grządziel; Michał Radwan; Łukasz Dolla; Marta Szlag; Małgorzata Stąpór-Fudzińska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-11-18

5.  Dosimetric impact in the dose-volume histograms of rectal and vesical wall contouring in prostate cancer IMRT treatments.

Authors:  Laura Gómez; Carlos Andrés; Antonio Ruiz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 6.  Total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy in pediatric patients: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Małgorzata Skórska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-07-19

7.  Feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to treat gastric cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka Skrobala; Marta Adamczyk; Aldona Karczewska-Dzionk
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-11-16

8.  Comparative dosimetrical analysis of intensity-modulated arc therapy, CyberKnife therapy and image-guided interstitial HDR and LDR brachytherapy of low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georgina Fröhlich; Péter Ágoston; Kliton Jorgo; Gábor Stelczer; Csaba Polgár; Tibor Major
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-04-14

9.  Evaluation of image-guidance strategies for prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Piotrowski; K Kaczmarek; T Bajon; A Ryczkowski; A Jodda; J Kaźmierska
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.