Maria Konopacka1, Jacek Rogoliński1, Krzysztof Slosarek2. 1. Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland. 2. Department of Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy Treatment Planning, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The biological effects of ionizing radiation have long been thought to results from direct targeting of the nucleus leading to DNA damage. Over the years, a number of non-targeted or epigenetic effects of radiation exposure have been reported where genetic damage occurs in cells that are not directly irradiated but respond to signals transmitted from irradiated cells, a phenomenon termed the "bystander effects". AIM: We compared the direct and bystander responses of human A 549, BEAS-2-B and NHDF cell lines exposed to both photon (6 MV) and electron (22 MeV) radiation inside a water phantom. The cultures were directly irradiated or exposed to scattered radiation 4 cm outside the field. In parallel, non-irradiated cells (termed bystander cells) were incubated in ICM (irradiation conditioned medium) collected from another pool of irradiated cells (termed donor cells). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In directly irradiated cells as well as ICM-treated cells, the frequency of micronuclei and condensation of chromatin characteristic for the apoptotic process were estimated using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus test. RESULTS: In all tested cell lines, radiation induced apoptosis and formation of micronuclei. A549 and BEAS-2B cells cultured in ICM showed increased levels of micronuclei and apoptosis, whereas normal human fibroblasts (NHDF line) were resistant to bystander response. In A549 and BEAS-2B cells placed outside the radiation field and exposed to scattered radiation the formation of micronuclei and induction of apoptosis were similar to that after ICM-treatment. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the genetic damage in cells exposed to scattered radiation is caused by factors released by irradiated cells into the medium rather than by DNA damage induced directly by X rays. It seems that bystander effects may have important clinical implications for health risk after low level radiation exposure of cells lying outside the radiation field during clinical treatment.
BACKGROUND: The biological effects of ionizing radiation have long been thought to results from direct targeting of the nucleus leading to DNA damage. Over the years, a number of non-targeted or epigenetic effects of radiation exposure have been reported where genetic damage occurs in cells that are not directly irradiated but respond to signals transmitted from irradiated cells, a phenomenon termed the "bystander effects". AIM: We compared the direct and bystander responses of human A 549, BEAS-2-B and NHDF cell lines exposed to both photon (6 MV) and electron (22 MeV) radiation inside a water phantom. The cultures were directly irradiated or exposed to scattered radiation 4 cm outside the field. In parallel, non-irradiated cells (termed bystander cells) were incubated in ICM (irradiation conditioned medium) collected from another pool of irradiated cells (termed donor cells). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In directly irradiated cells as well as ICM-treated cells, the frequency of micronuclei and condensation of chromatin characteristic for the apoptotic process were estimated using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus test. RESULTS: In all tested cell lines, radiation induced apoptosis and formation of micronuclei. A549 and BEAS-2B cells cultured in ICM showed increased levels of micronuclei and apoptosis, whereas normal human fibroblasts (NHDF line) were resistant to bystander response. In A549 and BEAS-2B cells placed outside the radiation field and exposed to scattered radiation the formation of micronuclei and induction of apoptosis were similar to that after ICM-treatment. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the genetic damage in cells exposed to scattered radiation is caused by factors released by irradiated cells into the medium rather than by DNA damage induced directly by X rays. It seems that bystander effects may have important clinical implications for health risk after low level radiation exposure of cells lying outside the radiation field during clinical treatment.
Authors: Igor Koturbash; Jonathan Loree; Kristy Kutanzi; Clayton Koganow; Igor Pogribny; Olga Kovalchuk Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Marie-Hélène Gaugler; Michel Neunlist; Stéphanie Bonnaud; Philippe Aubert; Marc Benderitter; François Paris Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Alicia Marín; Margarita Martín; Olga Liñán; Felipe Alvarenga; Mario López; Laura Fernández; David Büchser; Laura Cerezo Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2014-08-28
Authors: Mohammad Johari Ibahim; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Premila Paiva; Yuqing Yang; Marina Zaitseva; Peter A W Rogers Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 1.925