Literature DB >> 24372608

Sexual selection can remove an experimentally induced mutation load.

Maria Almbro1, Leigh W Simmons.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is argued to be important for the removal of deleterious mutations, promoting population fitness, accelerating adaptation, and compensating for the two-fold cost of sex. Here we induced mutations in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus using ionizing radiation, and tested the efficacy of sexual selection in their removal. Mutations reduced male precopulatory (strength) and postcopulatory (testes mass) sexual traits. Two generations of sexual selection were sufficient to remove mutations that affected male strength, but not testes mass. Induced mutations did not affect female productivity, which was elevated by sexual selection. Our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that condition-dependent traits offer a large target for mutational variation, and that sexual selection can purge the genome of deleterious mutations and promote population fitness.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fitness variation; mutations; sexual selection; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372608     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Sexual selection protects against extinction.

Authors:  Alyson J Lumley; Łukasz Michalczyk; James J N Kitson; Lewis G Spurgin; Catriona A Morrison; Joanne L Godwin; Matthew E Dickinson; Oliver Y Martin; Brent C Emerson; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexual selection predicts species richness across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Michael G Ritchie; Edward H Morrow; Lucas Marie-Orleach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The effect of sexual selection on adaptation and extinction under increasing temperatures.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Sebastian Chmielewski; Eylem Aydogdu; Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Stephane Rombauts; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Wiesław Babik; Mateusz Konczal; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  Can sexual selection theory inform genetic management of captive populations? A review.

Authors:  Rémi Chargé; Céline Teplitsky; Gabriele Sorci; Matthew Low
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Courtship song does not increase the rate of adaptation to a thermally stressful environment in a Drosophila melanogaster laboratory population.

Authors:  Larry G Cabral; Brett Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.

Authors:  Robert J Dugand; W Jason Kennington; Joseph L Tomkins
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Crispin Y Jordan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.