Literature DB >> 29669902

The effect of sexual selection on adaptation and extinction under increasing temperatures.

Jonathan M Parrett1, Robert J Knell2.   

Abstract

Strong sexual selection has been reported to both enhance and hinder the adaptive capacity and persistence of populations when exposed to novel environments. Consequently, how sexual selection influences population adaption and persistence under stress remains widely debated. Here, we present two empirical investigations of the fitness consequences of sexual selection on populations of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella, exposed to stable or gradually increasing temperatures. When faced with increasing temperatures, strong sexual selection was associated with both increased fecundity and offspring survival compared with populations experiencing weak sexual selection, suggesting sexual selection acts to drive adaptive evolution by favouring beneficial alleles. Strong sexual selection did not, however, delay extinction when the temperature became excessively high. By manipulating individuals' mating opportunities during fitness assays, we were able to assess the effect of multiple mating independently from the effect of population-level sexual selection, and found that polyandry has a positive effect on both fecundity and offspring survival under increasing temperatures in those populations evolving with weak sexual selection. Within stable temperatures, there were some benefits from strong sexual selection but these were not consistent across the entire experiment, possibly reflecting changing costs and benefits of sexual selection under stabilizing and directional selection. These results indicate that sexual selection can provide a buffer against climate change and increase adaptation rates within a continuously changing environment. These positive effects of sexual selection may, however, be too small to protect populations and delay extinction when environmental changes are relatively rapid.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaption; climate change; extinction; increasing temperature; polyandry; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29669902      PMCID: PMC5936732          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities.

Authors:  Paul F Doherty; Gabriele Sorci; J Andrew Royle; James E Hines; James D Nichols; Thierry Boulinier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Aneil F Agrawal; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in mammals.

Authors:  Edward H Morrow; Claudia Fricke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment.

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Nicholas C Appleton; Scott L Allen; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Sexual selection expedites the evolution of pesticide resistance.

Authors:  Frances Jacomb; Jason Marsh; Luke Holman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Longevity cost of reproduction for males but no longevity cost of mating or courtship for females in the male-dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus binodis.

Authors:  Janne S Kotiaho; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.354

8.  Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Russell Lande; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Xavier A Harrison
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  A comparison of observation-level random effect and Beta-Binomial models for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data in ecology & evolution.

Authors:  Xavier A Harrison
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sperm morph and remating frequency in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.

Authors:  Doko-Miles J Thorburn; Robert J Knell; Jonathan M Parrett
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Miguel Gomez-Llano; John T Waller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Authors:  Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Emma Thilliez; Göran Arnqvist; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Anna Mammel; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  The stagnation paradox: the ever-improving but (more or less) stationary population fitness.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Viviparity and habitat restrictions may influence the evolution of male reproductive genes in tsetse fly (Glossina) species.

Authors:  Grazia Savini; Francesca Scolari; Lino Ometto; Omar Rota-Stabelli; Davide Carraretto; Ludvik M Gomulski; Giuliano Gasperi; Adly M M Abd-Alla; Serap Aksoy; Geoffrey M Attardo; Anna R Malacrida
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Sexual size dimorphism and male reproductive traits vary across populations of a tropical rainforest dung beetle species (Onthophagus babirussa).

Authors:  Kai Xin Toh; Sean Yap; Thary Gazi Goh; Nalini Puniamoorthy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.