Andrew P Traynor1, Cynthia J Boyle2, Kristin K Janke3. 1. School of Pharmacy, Concordia University Wisconsin, Mequon, Wisconsin. 2. School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland. 3. University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assist administrators and faculty members in colleges and schools of pharmacy by gathering expert opinion to frame, direct, and support investments in student leadership development. METHODS: Twenty-six leadership instructors participated in a 3-round, online, modified Delphi process to define doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) student leadership instruction. Round 1 asked open-ended questions about leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes to begin the generation of student leadership development guiding principles and competencies. Statements were identified as guiding principles when they were perceived as foundational to the instructional approach. Round 2 grouped responses for agreement rating and comment. Group consensus with a statement as a guiding principle was set prospectively at 80%. Round 3 allowed rating and comment on guidelines, modified from feedback in round 2, that did not meet consensus. The principles were verified by identifying common contemporary leadership development approaches in the literature. RESULTS: Twelve guiding principles, related to concepts of leadership and educational philosophy, were defined and could be linked to contemporary leadership development thought. These guiding principles describe the motivation for teaching leadership, the fundamental precepts of student leadership development, and the core tenets for leadership instruction. CONCLUSIONS: Expert opinion gathered using a Delphi process resulted in guiding principles that help to address many of the fundamental questions that arise when implementing or refining leadership curricula. The principles identified are supported by common contemporary leadership development thought.
OBJECTIVE: To assist administrators and faculty members in colleges and schools of pharmacy by gathering expert opinion to frame, direct, and support investments in student leadership development. METHODS: Twenty-six leadership instructors participated in a 3-round, online, modified Delphi process to define doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) student leadership instruction. Round 1 asked open-ended questions about leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes to begin the generation of student leadership development guiding principles and competencies. Statements were identified as guiding principles when they were perceived as foundational to the instructional approach. Round 2 grouped responses for agreement rating and comment. Group consensus with a statement as a guiding principle was set prospectively at 80%. Round 3 allowed rating and comment on guidelines, modified from feedback in round 2, that did not meet consensus. The principles were verified by identifying common contemporary leadership development approaches in the literature. RESULTS: Twelve guiding principles, related to concepts of leadership and educational philosophy, were defined and could be linked to contemporary leadership development thought. These guiding principles describe the motivation for teaching leadership, the fundamental precepts of student leadership development, and the core tenets for leadership instruction. CONCLUSIONS: Expert opinion gathered using a Delphi process resulted in guiding principles that help to address many of the fundamental questions that arise when implementing or refining leadership curricula. The principles identified are supported by common contemporary leadership development thought.
Authors: Kristin K Janke; Karen B Farris; Katherine A Kelley; Vincent D Marshall; Kimberly S Plake; Steven A Scott; Todd D Sorensen; Gary C Yee Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Jennifer A Phillips; Milena M McLaughlin; Jacob P Gettig; Jay R Fajiculay; M Renee Advincula Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Robert C Haight; Claire Kolar; Michael H Nelson; Kerry K Fierke; Brandon J Sucher; Kristin K Janke Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2017-03-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Kristin K Janke; Michael H Nelson; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; David G Fuentes; Ettie Rosenberg; Robert DiCenzo Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 2.047