Literature DB >> 24369126

Plasticity of melanoma and EMT-TF reprogramming.

Eugene Tulchinsky1, J Howard Pringle, Julie Caramel, Stéphane Ansieau.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24369126      PMCID: PMC3960181          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
For several decades, tumour progression has been considered as linear process involving clonal selection of most aggressive cell variants. Within the framework of this concept, multiple attempts have been made to identify genes specifically activated at late cancer stages and involved in cancer metastases. However, there are no experimental evidences supporting the existence of such purely “metastatic genes”, and metastatic behaviour is likely to be induced by the same mutationally-activated pathways that cause neoplastic transformation. In line with this view is the parallel model of tumour progression and metastases. It proposes that at least in some cancer types early metastatic spread is concomitant with oncogenic transformation, i.e. the same genetic insults are responsible for the tumourigenicity and metastatic dissemination [1, 2]. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a reversible embryonic genetic program reactivated in cancer. EMT is controlled by several transcription factors, EMT-TFs (TWIST1, TWIST2, SNAIL1, SNAIL2, ZEB1, ZEB2, etc.). The initial view on EMT as just a process leading to enhanced cell motility and invasion was reconsidered in recent years. Aberrant activation of EMT programs in tumour cells affects cell proliferation, survival, drug resistance, tumourigenicity and stem cell-like features [3]. In particular, a proinvasive EMT-TF, TWIST1 cooperates with activated oncogenes by overriding oncogene-induced senescence [2]. These findings propose that EMT may act in concert with classical oncogenic pathways and contribute to different stages of tumourigenesis including tumor initiation, growth and spread. We addressed the interrelationship between EMT-TF network and tumour-initiating pathways in malignant melanoma [4]. Melanoma represents an example of a cancer type solely dependent on the oncogenic pathways initiated by gain-of function mutations in BRAF, NRAS, GRM3 or MEK1/2 with all of them leading to the activation of MEK-ERK module. Melanocytic lineage is distinct from epithelium; it evolves from neural crest, an embryonic cell population regulated by EMT pathways. Our data show that normal melanocytes are positive for SNAIL2 and ZEB2, but negative for ZEB1 and TWIST1. In vitro activation of the MEK-ERK signalling results in the reversion of EMT-TF expression pattern, the downregulation of SNAIL2 and ZEB2 and upregulation of ZEB1/TWIST1. This reversible EMT-TF reprogramming is followed by the reduction in the expression of a master regulator of melanocytic lineage, microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), and repression of the downstream differentiation program. Moreover, switch to ZEB1 and TWIST1 is utterly required for the tumourigenic potential of BRAF in vitro and in vivo and for the increased invasiveness of BRAF-transformed melanocytes. Though the absolute majority of melanocytic lesions contain MEK-activating mutations, they exhibit a large degree of heterogeneity with regard to phospho-ERK immunopositivity. This is largely due to the activation of different negative feedback pathways in benign nevi and horizontal phase melanoma, and acquisition of bypass mechanisms in advanced cancer. Our analyses of melanoma samples have shown that EMT-TF reprogramming does exist in human melanoma. It strongly correlated with the phospho-ERK immunopositivity and poor patients' survival. Gradients of EMT-TF expression were observed in both the primary melanoma and independent or matched metastases. Namely, expression of ZEB2/SNAIL2 detected in superficial parts of primary tumours and cortical areas of lymph node metastases gradually decreased with the distance from the edge of the lesion. The expression of ZEB1 and TWIST1 was observed in deeper parts of primary tumours and medullary areas of nodal metastases and significantly correlated with phospho- ERK immunopositivity. The reestablishment of EMT-TFs gradients at secondary sites may indicate the existence of multiple waves of EMT-TF reprogramming, or reflect early metastatic dissemination. A so-called “rheostat model” proposes that MITF controls phenotypic switches between proliferative, differentiated and tumourigenic/invasive phenotypes in malignant melanoma [5]. Our data place the reversible switches in the EMT-TF network upstream of MITF in this model (Fig. 1). The reversibility of EMT-TF switches in melanoma is reminiscent of the reestablishment of epithelial morphology in carcinoma metastases [6]. In both cancer types, differentiated and tumourigenic states would be equally important for the accomplishment of the metastatic process.
Figure 1

A scheme illustrating MEK-ERK-FRA1- regulated EMT-TFs switches during melanomagenesis

These reversible switches impact on MITF expression and phenotypic plasticity in malignant melanoma.

A scheme illustrating MEK-ERK-FRA1- regulated EMT-TFs switches during melanomagenesis

These reversible switches impact on MITF expression and phenotypic plasticity in malignant melanoma. An important player in the MEK/ERK/EMT-TF pathway is an AP1 transcription factor family member, FOS-related antigen 1 (FRA1). FRA1 is an effector of RAS pathway in different cancer types. In melanoma, it directly binds promoters of EMT-TF genes, and FRA1 depletion largely mimics an effect that MEK inhibition has on EMT-TF network. Reduced tumourigenic potential of melanoma cells with depleted FRA1 was rescued by ectopic expression of ZEB1 or TWIST1. Interestingly, a recent study has shown that FRA1 is activated by TWIST1 and SNAIL1 and serves as a gatekeeper of EMT/cancer stem cells program in breast carcinoma cells [7]. The existence of slowly proliferating, tumourigenic and drug-resistant cells within the tumour cell population represents an aggravating factor in failure of conventional anti-proliferative therapies. Sáez-Ayala M et al. proposed an alternative two-step treatment strategy based on methotrexate-mediated upregulation of MITF leading to the expression of melanocyte-specific tyrosinase gene in melanoma cells [8]. The second agent is the pro-drug, TMECG, which after being activated by tyrosinase, inhibits DHFR resulting in apoptosis. Given that FRA1 orchestrates EMT-TF reprogramming, an alternative method for switching MITF-dependent differentiation/transformation equilibrium in melanoma would be specific targeting of molecular pathways modulating FRA1 activity.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cells versus phenotype-switching in melanoma.

Authors:  Keith S Hoek; Colin R Goding
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.693

2.  Protein kinase C α is a central signaling node and therapeutic target for breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Wai Leong Tam; Haihui Lu; Joyce Buikhuisen; Boon Seng Soh; Elgene Lim; Ferenc Reinhardt; Zhenhua Jeremy Wu; Jordan A Krall; Brian Bierie; Wenjun Guo; Xi Chen; Xiaole Shirley Liu; Myles Brown; Bing Lim; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease.

Authors:  Jean Paul Thiery; Hervé Acloque; Ruby Y J Huang; M Angela Nieto
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  A switch in the expression of embryonic EMT-inducers drives the development of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Julie Caramel; Eftychios Papadogeorgakis; Louise Hill; Gareth J Browne; Geoffrey Richard; Anne Wierinckx; Gerald Saldanha; Joy Osborne; Peter Hutchinson; Gina Tse; Joël Lachuer; Alain Puisieux; J Howard Pringle; Stéphane Ansieau; Eugene Tulchinsky
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Induction of EMT by twist proteins as a collateral effect of tumor-promoting inactivation of premature senescence.

Authors:  Stéphane Ansieau; Jeremy Bastid; Agnès Doreau; Anne-Pierre Morel; Benjamin P Bouchet; Clémence Thomas; Frédérique Fauvet; Isabelle Puisieux; Claudio Doglioni; Sara Piccinin; Roberta Maestro; Thibault Voeltzel; Abdelkader Selmi; Sandrine Valsesia-Wittmann; Claude Caron de Fromentel; Alain Puisieux
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Parallel progression of primary tumours and metastases.

Authors:  Christoph A Klein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Directed phenotype switching as an effective antimelanoma strategy.

Authors:  Magalí Sáez-Ayala; María F Montenegro; Luis Sánchez-Del-Campo; María Piedad Fernández-Pérez; Soledad Chazarra; Rasmus Freter; Mark Middleton; Antonio Piñero-Madrona; Juan Cabezas-Herrera; Colin R Goding; José Neptuno Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 31.743

  7 in total
  18 in total

1.  Melanoma Suppressor Functions of the Carcinoma Oncogene FOXQ1.

Authors:  Archis Bagati; Anna Bianchi-Smiraglia; Sudha Moparthy; Kateryna Kolesnikova; Emily E Fink; Brittany C Lipchick; Masha Kolesnikova; Peter Jowdy; Anthony Polechetti; Amin Mahpour; Jason Ross; Joseph A Wawrzyniak; Dong Hyun Yun; Gyorgy Paragh; Nadezhda I Kozlova; Albert E Berman; Jianmin Wang; Song Liu; Michael J Nemeth; Mikhail A Nikiforov
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Circulating tumor cells from melanoma patients show phenotypic plasticity and metastatic potential in xenograft NOD.CB17 mice.

Authors:  Claudia Felici; Francesco Mannavola; Luigia Stefania Stucci; Loren Duda; Paola Cafforio; Camillo Porta; Marco Tucci
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Mechanistic regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through RAS signaling pathway and therapeutic implications in human cancer.

Authors:  Kiran Tripathi; Minal Garg
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.782

Review 4.  Non-redundant functions of EMT transcription factors.

Authors:  Marc P Stemmler; Rebecca L Eccles; Simone Brabletz; Thomas Brabletz
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 5.  The nuclear oncoprotein Fra-1: a transcription factor knocking on therapeutic applications' door.

Authors:  Francesco Talotta; Laura Casalino; Pasquale Verde
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Bone Morphogenic Protein Signaling and Melanoma.

Authors:  Piotr Kraj
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17

Review 7.  EMT or EMT-Promoting Transcription Factors, Where to Focus the Light?

Authors:  Stéphane Ansieau; Guillaume Collin; Louise Hill
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma.

Authors:  Harish C Pal; Ariana C Diamond; Leah R Strickland; John C Kappes; Santosh K Katiyar; Craig A Elmets; Mohammad Athar; Farrukh Afaq
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-12

9.  ZEB1-mediated melanoma cell plasticity enhances resistance to MAPK inhibitors.

Authors:  Geoffrey Richard; Stéphane Dalle; Marie-Ambre Monet; Maud Ligier; Amélie Boespflug; Roxane M Pommier; Arnaud de la Fouchardière; Marie Perier-Muzet; Lauriane Depaepe; Romain Barnault; Garance Tondeur; Stéphane Ansieau; Emilie Thomas; Corine Bertolotto; Robert Ballotti; Samia Mourah; Maxime Battistella; Céleste Lebbé; Luc Thomas; Alain Puisieux; Julie Caramel
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 12.137

10.  Thrombospondin 1 promotes an aggressive phenotype through epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in human melanoma.

Authors:  Aparna Jayachandran; Matthew Anaka; Prashanth Prithviraj; Christopher Hudson; Sonja J McKeown; Pu-Han Lo; Laura J Vella; Colin R Goding; Jonathan Cebon; Andreas Behren
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.