| Literature DB >> 35820816 |
Claudia Felici1,2, Francesco Mannavola3, Luigia Stefania Stucci3, Loren Duda4, Paola Cafforio1, Camillo Porta1,3, Marco Tucci5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Innovative therapies have improved the overall survival in melanoma, although a high number of patients still experience disease progression or recurrence. Ex-vivo culture of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) represents a valuable laboratory resource for in-depth characterization of rare cell populations responsible for disease progression.Entities:
Keywords: Circulating tumor cells; Melanoma; Metastases; NOD.CB17 mice; Phenotypic plasticity; Stemness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35820816 PMCID: PMC9275157 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09829-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.638
Demographic characteristics of 15 patients with metastatic melanoma
| Patient ID | Sex | Primary site | Stage (diagnosis) | Breslow (mm) | Ulceration | Mitosis | BLS/CLND | Stage (enrolment) | BRAF Status | Metastastic Sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | Trunk | IIIA | 0.9 | N | > 1 | N1a | IV – M1a(0) | WT | Sc |
| 2 | M | Arm | IIIB | 1.9 | Y | > 1 | N2a | IV – M1b(0) | V600E | N; L; Sc |
| 3 | F | Arm | IIIB | 1.2 | N | > 1 | N2b | IV – M1a(0) | WT | N |
| 4 | F | Arm | IIIB | 1.5 | Y | < 1 | N2b | IV – M1c(0) | V600E | Li; Pe; Ad; Mu |
| 5 | M | Trunk | IV | 1.6 | Y | > 1 | ND | IV – M1b(1) | V600E | L |
| 6 | M | Trunk | IIIC | 11 | Y | > 1 | N2c | IV – M1c(1) | V6003 | L; N; Bo; Li; Br |
| 7 | F | Leg | IIIB | 2.1 | N | > 1 | N1a | IV – M1b(0) | V600E | N; L; Sc |
| 8 | M | H/N | IV | 4.8 | Y | > 1 | ND | IV – M1c(0) | V600E | L; Li; Pe; Mu; Sc |
| 9 | M | H/N | IIIC | 5.4 | Y | > 1 | N1b | IV – M1d(−) | V600E | Br; L; Ad; Sc; N |
| 10 | M | Trunk | IV | 2.4 | Y | > 1 | ND | IV – M1c(−) | V600E | N; Bo; Sc; Mu |
| 11 | F | Leg | IIIB | 3.6 | N | < 1 | N2a | IV – M1c(0) | V600E | N; Li; Bo; Sc |
| 12 | F | Trunk | IIIC | 1.6 | Y | > 1 | N3c | IV – M1c(1) | WT | L; N; Sc; Sp |
| 13 | F | U | IV | – | – | – | ND | IV – M1d(0) | V600E | L; Br; Sc; Sp |
| 14 | M | Leg | IV | 7 | Y | > 1 | ND | IV – M1c(0) | V600E | N; L; Li; Pe |
| 15 | M | Leg | IIIC | 5.1 | Y | > 1 | N1a | IV – M1c(−) | V600E | N; Sc; Br; Bo; O |
Ad Adrenal gland, Bo Bone, Br Brain, Li Liver, L Lung, Mu Muscle, N Extra-regional nodes, O Ovary, Pe Peritoneum, Sc Subcutaneous, Sp Spleen, H/N Head and Neck, ND Not Done, U Unknown, LDH Low:(0), LDH high:(1), LDH not available at diagnosis:(−)
Fig. 1Ex vivo culture of melanoma CTCs. A Representative microscopic images of CTC cultures at day 15, day 30, day 45 and 60. B Representative panels of MART-1 (green) and beta-Actin (ACTB, red) expression by immunofluorescence staining of cultured CTCs. The DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, blue) served for counterstaining the nuclei. Magnification, 40x. Scale bar: 20 μm
Fig. 2Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the CTC-AT cells. A-C The phenotypic profile of CTCs and Sk-Mel-28 was explored by flow cytometry. Representative panels show the similar expression of Melan-A (100%), CD146 (100%) and RANK (32 + 5.4%) in CTCs and Sk-Mel-28. CTCs line showed an intermediate EMT phenotype (E-CAD: 89 ± 3.9%; N-CAD: 100%) whereas Sk-Mel-28 were exclusively N-cadherin positive. The CXCR4 expression was almost similar although the MFI was lower in CTCs (MFI: 2616 vs. 3254). The CD155 and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was similar although a different MFI was revealed. D Real time-PCR explored the basal expression of EMT transcriptional factors in CTC-AT. Results are expressed as 2−Δct and bars represent mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01. All experiments were completed in triplicate and repeated three times thus obtaining similar results
Fig. 3Circulating tumor cells show the molecular and functional features of cancer stem cells. A Typical cancer stem cell (CSC) antigens as CD44, CD105, CD90 and CD73 were highly expressed by CTC-AT in a fashion similar to Sk-Mel-28 positive control. B Representative panels showing ALDH1 activity in presence (+) or absence (−) of an ALDH1 inhibitor (DEAB). Cells included in the framed region are those ALDH1+. C mRNA expression levels of CSC transcription factors in CTC-AT cells and Sk-Mel-28. Results are expressed as 2−Δct and bars are mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01. D) Melanospheres formation efficiency of the three generation (G1-G3) of CTC-AT. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). SFA: sphere formation assay. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and representative examples are shown
Fig. 4Tumor growth in xenograft model. A Representative bioluminescent images showing the tumor growth in xenograft NOD.CB17 mice injected with the Sk-Mel-28) and CTC- -AT up to 28 days after the inoculum. The color scale ranged from blue (just above the background noise; set to 1 × 107 photons / s / cm2 / sr) to red (at least 2.5 × 108 photons / s / cm2 / sr). B Dotted line represents the exponential model fit to the tumor size data points from mice. Tumor growth based on relative increase of median photon flux (photon/s) per second within ROI areas is significantly higher in mice inoculated with Sk-Mel-28 respect to CTC-AT line (p < 0.05)
Fig. 5Histological analyses of primary melanoma, CTC tumor xenograft and metastasis. Representative comparative images by immune-histochemistry revealing the expression of MART1, Ki67, HMB45 and S100 by primary patient-derived melanoma (A), the xenograft primary tumor (B) and lymph node (C) and renal (D) metastasis of bearing-tumor mice. Magnification, × 40. Scale bar, 50 μm