Literature DB >> 24368987

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection following stent insertion for obstructing left-sided colon cancer.

Seoung Yoon Rho1, Sung Uk Bae1, Se Jin Baek1, Hyuk Hur1, Byung Soh Min1, Seung Hyuk Baik1, Kang Young Lee1, Nam Kyu Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection following the insertion of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) for the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer.
METHODS: Between October 2006 and December 2012, laparoscopic resection following SEMS insertion was performed in 54 patients with obstructing left-sided colon cancer.
RESULTS: All 54 procedures were technically successful without the need for conversion to open surgery. The median interval from SEMS insertion to laparoscopic surgery was 9 days (range, 3-41 days). The median surgery time was 200 minutes (range, 57-444 minutes), and estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range, 10-3,500 mL). The median time to soft diet was 4 days (range, 2-8 days) and possible length of stay (hypothetical length of stay according to the discharge criteria) was 7 days (range, 4-22 days). The median total number of lymph nodes harvested was 23 (range, 8-71) and loop ileostomy was performed in 2 patients (4%). Six patients (11%) developed postoperative complications: 2 patients with anastomotic leakages, 1 with bladder leakage, and 3 with ileus. There was no mortality within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the presence of a SEMS does not compromise the laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic resection following stent insertion for obstructing left-sided colon cancer could be performed with a favorable safety profile and short-term outcome. Large-scale comparative studies with long-term follow-up are needed to demonstrate a significant benefit of this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonic neoplasms; Laparoscopy; Stents

Year:  2013        PMID: 24368987      PMCID: PMC3868681          DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc        ISSN: 1226-0053


  29 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; Y Kabeshima; M Watanabe; S Yamamoto; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Lisa Martin Hawver; Ziad Awad; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

4.  Malignant colonic obstruction managed by endoscopic stent decompression followed by laparoscopic resections.

Authors:  M Morino; A Bertello; A Garbarini; G Rozzio; A Repici
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Colorectal resection after stent insertion for obstructing cancer: comparison between open and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Wai L Law; Jensen T C Poon; Joe K M Fan; Oswens S H Lo
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  The role of one-stage surgery in acute left-sided colonic obstruction.

Authors:  P W Lau; C Y Lo; W L Law
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Malignant obstruction of the left colon.

Authors:  G T Deans; Z H Krukowski; S T Irwin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Comparison of one-stage managements of obstructing left-sided colon and rectal cancer: stent-laparoscopic approach vs. intraoperative colonic lavage.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Byoung Mo Kang; Kyoung Hoon Lim; In-Taek Lee; Seong Woo Jeon; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of metal stents for malignant obstruction of the common bile duct.

Authors:  K Knyrim; H J Wagner; J Pausch; N Vakil
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Colonic stenting: an opportunity with a risk : A critical evaluation].

Authors:  R Albrecht; H Hönicke; C Bochmann; U Settmacher; T Wirth
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Compression injury of the circular stapler for gastrointestinal end-to-end anastomosis: preliminary in-vitro study.

Authors:  Gyung Mo Son; Myeong Sook Kwon; Hong-Min Ahn; In Young Lee; Gun Ho Kim; Kyoung Won Nam; JoonWon Lee; Chang-Suk Kong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.859

3.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection following stent insertion for obstructing colon cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung Uk Bae; Chun-Seok Yang; Sohyun Kim; Dae Ro Lim; Woon Kyung Jeong; Dae Dong Kim; Jae Hwang Kim; Eung Jin Shin; Yoo Jin Lee; Ju Yup Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Seong Kyu Baek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Naotsugu Haraguchi; Masataka Ikeda; Masakazu Miyake; Takuya Yamada; Yuko Sakakibara; Eiji Mita; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori; Mitsugu Sekimoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Endoscopic stenting in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tian-Zhi Lim; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12

6.  Self-expandable metallic stent as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for acute malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiong Li; Xiao-Hua Wu; Hai-yan Wu; Wen-Ju Chang; Xiu-juan Chang; Tuo Yi; Qiang Shi; Jing-Wen Chen; Qing-Yang Feng; De-Xiang Zhu; Ye Wei; Yun-Shi Zhong; Jian-Min Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon perforation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jeongsoo Kim; Gil Jae Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek; Won-Suk Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies.

Authors:  Xianwei Mo; Yang Yang; Hao Lai; Jun Xiao; Ke He; Jiansi Chen; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-18

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery after placing a self-expanding metallic stent for malignant rectal obstruction: a case report.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takeyama; Katsuki Danno; Takahiko Nishigaki; Masafumi Yamashita; Masami Yamazaki; Tsuyoshi Yamakita; Akihiro Nishihara; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Masayo Mizutani; Itsuko Nakamichi; Mamoru Yura; Kimimasa Ikeda; Yoshio Oka
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.