Literature DB >> 8910782

Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care.

D W Robertson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study empirically whether ethical theory (from the mainstream principles-based, virtue-based, and feminist schools) usefully describes the approaches doctors and nurses take in everyday patient care.
DESIGN: Ethnographic methods: participant observation and interviews, the transcripts of which were analysed to identify themes in ethical approaches.
SETTING: A British old-age psychiatry ward. PARTICIPANTS: The more than 20 doctors and nurses on the ward.
RESULTS: Doctors and nurses on the ward differed in their conceptions of the principles of beneficence and respect for patient autonomy. Nurses shared with doctors a commitment to liberal and utilitarian conceptions of these principles, but also placed much greater weight on relationships and character virtues when expressing the same principles. Nurses also emphasised patient autonomy, while doctors were more likely to advocate beneficence, when the two principles conflicted.
CONCLUSION: The study indicates that ethical theory can, contrary to the charges of certain critics, be relevant to everyday health care-if it (a) attends to social context and (b) is flexible enough to draw on various schools of theory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8910782      PMCID: PMC1377062          DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.5.292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

Review 1.  Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics?

Authors:  B Hoffmaster
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Medical house officers' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding medical ethics.

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; G Geller; D M Levine; R Faden
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-12

3.  Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument.

Authors:  P Hébert; E M Meslin; E V Dunn; N Byrne; S R Reid
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research.

Authors:  P Burnard
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Assessing the clinical ethical competence of undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  K R Mitchell; C Myser; I H Kerridge
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Prognostic conflict in life-and-death decisions: the organization as an ecology of knowledge.

Authors:  R R Anspach
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1987-09

7.  A randomized trial of ethics education for medical house officers.

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; G Geller; D M Levine; R R Faden
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Medical morality is not bioethics--medical ethics in China and the United States.

Authors:  R C Fox; J P Swazey
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.416

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Narrative and knowledge development in medical ethics.

Authors:  P Tovey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Ethical theory, ethnography, doctors and nurses.

Authors:  M Jefferys
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Clinical ethics and patient advocacy: the power of communication in health care.

Authors:  Inken Annegret Emrich; Leyla Fröhlich-Güzelsoy; Florian Bruns; Bernd Friedrich; Andreas Frewer
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

4.  Profiles of neurological outcome prediction among intensivists.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Marie-Josée Dion; Christine A C Wijman; Judy Illes; Maarten G Lansberg
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Negative ethical behaviors in Saudi hospitals: How prevalent are they perceived to be? - Statement agreement study.

Authors:  R Fayez; A Nawwab; H Al-Jahdali; S Baharoon; S Binsalih; A Al Sayyari
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2013-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.