OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of an insulin infusion site warming device, the InsuPatch(40)(™) (IP(40)) (InsuLine Medical Ltd., Petach-Tikvah, Israel), on insulin aspart pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventeen subjects with type 1 diabetes (age, 15±1 years; hemoglobin A1c, 7.5±0.2% [58±2.2 mmol/mol]) underwent two euglycemic clamps performed on separate mornings with and without IP(40) activation with warming temperature at 40°C. On both days, the basal infusion was suspended, and glucose levels were maintained between 90 and 100 mg/dL by a variable rate dextrose infusion for up to 5 h after a 0.2 U/kg bolus of insulin aspart. RESULTS: Time to peak insulin action and time to half-maximal action occurred earlier with a greater early glucodynamic effect (area under the curve [AUC] for glucose infusion rate from 0 to 30 min) with IP(40) than without the IP(40), whereas the AUC for the time-action profile and the peak action did not differ with and without infusion site warming. PK parameters were in agreement with PD parameters, namely, a significantly earlier time to reach the maximum increment in insulin concentrations and greater early bioavailability (AUC for the change in insulin concentration from 0 to 30 min) with the IP(40). The tail of the plasma insulin response curve was also shortened with infusion site warming, with the time to reach baseline insulin concentration occurring significantly earlier (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that skin warming around the infusion site to 40°C with the IP(40) is an effective means to accelerate absorption and action of rapid-acting insulin. These improvements in time-action responses have the potential to enhance the performance of open- and closed-loop insulin delivery systems.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of an insulin infusion site warming device, the InsuPatch(40)(™) (IP(40)) (InsuLine Medical Ltd., Petach-Tikvah, Israel), on insulinaspart pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventeen subjects with type 1 diabetes (age, 15±1 years; hemoglobin A1c, 7.5±0.2% [58±2.2 mmol/mol]) underwent two euglycemic clamps performed on separate mornings with and without IP(40) activation with warming temperature at 40°C. On both days, the basal infusion was suspended, and glucose levels were maintained between 90 and 100 mg/dL by a variable rate dextrose infusion for up to 5 h after a 0.2 U/kg bolus of insulinaspart. RESULTS: Time to peak insulin action and time to half-maximal action occurred earlier with a greater early glucodynamic effect (area under the curve [AUC] for glucose infusion rate from 0 to 30 min) with IP(40) than without the IP(40), whereas the AUC for the time-action profile and the peak action did not differ with and without infusion site warming. PK parameters were in agreement with PD parameters, namely, a significantly earlier time to reach the maximum increment in insulin concentrations and greater early bioavailability (AUC for the change in insulin concentration from 0 to 30 min) with the IP(40). The tail of the plasma insulin response curve was also shortened with infusion site warming, with the time to reach baseline insulin concentration occurring significantly earlier (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that skin warming around the infusion site to 40°C with the IP(40) is an effective means to accelerate absorption and action of rapid-acting insulin. These improvements in time-action responses have the potential to enhance the performance of open- and closed-loop insulin delivery systems.
Authors: Marcus Hompesch; Douglas B Muchmore; Linda Morrow; Elizabeth Ludington; Daniel E Vaughn Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Eda Cengiz; Stuart A Weinzimer; Jennifer L Sherr; Eileen Tichy; Melody Martin; Lori Carria; Amy Steffen; William V Tamborlane Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2012-10-28 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Stuart A Weinzimer; Garry M Steil; Karena L Swan; Jim Dziura; Natalie Kurtz; William V Tamborlane Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Alfonso Galderisi; Nathan Cohen; Peter Calhoun; Kristen Kraemer; Marc Breton; Stuart Weinzimer; Eda Cengiz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Laura M Nally; Jennifer L Sherr; Michelle A Van Name; Anisha D Patel; William V Tamborlane Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.045
Authors: Gabriel Bitton; Vital Rom; Uri Hadelsberg; Itamar Raz; Eda Cengiz; Stuart Weinzimer; William V Tamborlane Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: Xiaoyu Sun; Mudassir Rashid; Nicole Hobbs; Mohammad Reza Askari; Rachel Brandt; Andrew Shahidehpour; Ali Cinar Journal: Control Eng Pract Date: 2021-09-11 Impact factor: 4.057
Authors: Yue Ruan; Hood Thabit; Lalantha Leelarathna; Sara Hartnell; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Martin Tauschmann; Sibylle Dellweg; Carsten Benesch; Julia K Mader; Manuel Holzer; Harald Kojzar; Mark L Evans; Thomas R Pieber; Sabine Arnolds; Roman Hovorka Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: A K J Gradel; T Porsgaard; J Lykkesfeldt; T Seested; S Gram-Nielsen; N R Kristensen; H H F Refsgaard Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Jason P Pitt; Olivia M McCarthy; Thomas Hoeg-Jensen; Benjamin M Wellman; Richard M Bracken Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.555