Literature DB >> 21160322

Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review.

Vanessa P Ho1, Yoori Lee, Sharon L Stein, Larissa K F Temple.   

Abstract

Sexual function is one element of QOL that may be significantly altered following treatment for rectal cancer, but the incidence and contributing risk factors are generally poorly understood. Nevertheless, the impact of rectal cancer therapy on sexual function should be conveyed to patients preoperatively. In addition to helping patients evolve realistic expectations, it will help clinicians identify those for whom interventions may be appropriate. In the past 10 years, there has been an increase in the number of studies reporting sexual dysfunction following rectal cancer treatment. However, these studies are difficult to interpret collectively for a variety of reasons. Most importantly, sexual dysfunction lacks a standardized definition, which leads to poor comparability between studies. The best inclusive definitions describe sexual dysfunction as a collection of distinct symptoms, which differ for men and women. The absence of sexual activity is sometimes used as a surrogate for sexual dysfunction, but this is confounded by an individual's desire and opportunity for sexual activity, and may not be an accurate reflection of physiologic functionality. Additional factors complicating assimilation of studies include the absence of baseline data, missing data, small sample sizes, and heterogeneity in use of validated and nonvalidated instruments. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the contemporary literature reporting sexual function after rectal surgery to determine the overall risk of sexual dysfunction, evaluate possible contributing factors, and identify questions that should be addressed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21160322     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb7b82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  39 in total

1.  Stigma, perceived blame, self-blame, and depressive symptoms in men with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Phelan; Joan M Griffin; George L Jackson; S Yousuf Zafar; Wendy Hellerstedt; Mandy Stahre; David Nelson; Leah L Zullig; Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Role of local excision in the management of rectal cancer: what does the future hold?

Authors:  P A Cataldo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Survivorship care plans for people with colorectal cancer: do they reflect the research evidence?

Authors:  V D'Souza; H Daudt; A Kazanjian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Y Ziv; A Zbar; Y Bar-Shavit; I Igov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Addressing sexual dysfunction in colorectal cancer survivorship care.

Authors:  Jennifer C Averyt; Patricia W Nishimoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-10

6.  A novel preoperative risk score to predict lymph node positivity for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: An NCDB analysis to guide operative technique.

Authors:  Adriana C Gamboa; Yuan Liu; Rachel M Lee; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Charles A Staley; Maria C Russell; Kenneth Cardona; Patrick S Sullivan; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Colorectal surgery and its impact on male sexual function.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Nelson Bennett
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  Soo Yeun Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Hye Jin Kim; Jong-Pil Ryuk; Sung-Hwan Yun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Postoperative bladder and sexual function in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  R S Lim; T X Yang; T C Chua
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.