Literature DB >> 24365907

Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011.

Alejandro Marquez-Lara1, Sreeharsha V Nandyala, Steven J Fineberg, Kern Singh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate national trends of cervical spine surgical procedures from 2002 to 2011. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a paucity of literature assessing the current practice trends and outcomes of cervical spine surgery following the 2008 Food and Drug Administration public health notifications regarding bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) utilization in cervical spine surgical procedures.
METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was accessed for each year across 2002 to 2011. Patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion, posterior cervical fusion, and posterior cervical decompression were identified. Patient and hospitalization parameters including demographics, BMP utilization, costs, early postoperative outcomes, and mortality were assessed for each surgical cohort. A Pearson correlation coefficient with a 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05) was used to analyze trends in patient and hospital outcome parameters during this 10-year period.
RESULTS: A total of 307,188 cervical spine procedures were performed from 2002 to 2011. Both the anterior cervical fusion and posterior cervical fusion cohort demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of procedures performed over time (r = +0.9, P < 0.001). A significant uptrend in patient age (r = +1.0, P < 0.001) and comorbidity burden (r = +0.9, P < 0.001) was demonstrated during the studied decade. Overall, BMP utilization (r = +0.7, P = 0.02) also demonstrated a significant increase during this time period, but demonstrated a decline after peaking in 2007. The posterior cervical fusion cohort demonstrated the greatest comorbidity, length of stay, costs, and mortality.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the number of cervical spine procedures has increased between 2002 and 2011, irrespective of the change in BMP utilization after the 2008 Food and Drug Administration warning. Despite an older patient population with greater comorbidities undergoing cervical spine surgeries, hospital length of stay and mortality has not significantly changed. However, we did note a significant increase in costs during this time period. These findings may be related to advances in surgical technology and instrumentation that may be associated with rising hospital costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24365907     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  37 in total

1.  Trends analysis of surgical procedures for cervical degenerative disc disease and myelopathy in patients with tobacco use disorder.

Authors:  Phillip Grisdela; Zorica Buser; Anthony D'Oro; Permsak Paholpak; John C Liu; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Epidemiological trends in spine surgery over 10 years in a multicenter database.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Impact of old age on patient-report outcomes and cost utility for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Silky Chotai; Scott L Parker; J Alex Sielatycki; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Harrison F Kay; Joseph B Wick; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Demineralized bone matrix in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shayan Abdollah Zadegan; Aidin Abedi; Seyed Behnam Jazayeri; Alexander R Vaccaro; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of mental health on post-operative infection rates following cervical spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Emin Dedeogullari; Permsak Paholpak; Kaku Barkoh; Joshua Lucas; Larry Lee; Christopher Wang; Patrick C Hsieh; Jeffrey C Wang; Zorica Buser
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

6.  Predictors of outcomes and hospital charges following atlantoaxial fusion.

Authors:  Joseph E Tanenbaum; Daniel Lubelski; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Nicolas R Thompson; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Length of stay associated with posterior cervical fusion with intervertebral cages: experience from a device registry.

Authors:  Kris Siemionow; William Smith; Mark Gillespy; Bruce M McCormack; Mukund I Gundanna; Jon E Block
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Rates of Mortality in Cervical Spine Surgical Procedures and Factors Associated With Its Occurrence Over a 10-Year Period: A Study of 342 477 Patients on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Gregory Wyatt Poorman; John Y Moon; Samantha R Horn; Cyrus Jalai; Peter L Zhou; Olivia Bono; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

9.  Orthopaedics and neurosurgery: Is there a difference in surgical outcomes following anterior cervical spinal fusion?

Authors:  Gautham Prabhakar; Nicholas Kusnezov; John Dunn; Andrew Cleveland; Joshua Herzog
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-18

10.  Safety and feasibility of an early telephone-supported home exercise program after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a case series.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Clinton J Devin; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Oran S Aaronson; Christine M Haug; Erin E Van Hoy; Susan W Vanston; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.