Literature DB >> 30276085

Rates of Mortality in Cervical Spine Surgical Procedures and Factors Associated With Its Occurrence Over a 10-Year Period: A Study of 342 477 Patients on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Gregory Wyatt Poorman1, John Y Moon1, Samantha R Horn1, Cyrus Jalai1, Peter L Zhou1, Olivia Bono1, Peter G Passias1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk of death is important in counseling patients and improving quality of care. Incidence of death in cervical surgery is not firmly established due to its rarity and limited sample sizes, particularly in the context of different surgeries, demographics, and risk factors. Particularly, different patient risk profiles may have varying degrees of risk in terms of surgeries, comorbidities, and demographics. This study aims to use a large patient cohort available on a national database to study the prevalence of death associated with cervical spine surgery.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) years 2003-2012. A total of 342 477 patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes undergoing spinal fusion or decompression for disc degeneration, stenosis, spondylosis, myelopathy, postlaminectomy syndrome, scoliosis, or neck pain associated with the cervical region. Patients with malignancy were excluded from analysis. Incidence of mortality was assessed by χ2 tests across different patient demographics and comorbidities, procedures performed, and concurrent in-hospital complications. Binary logistic regression identified significant increases or decreases in risk of death while controlling for comorbidities, race, sex, and Mirza invasiveness. Significance was defined as P < .05 differences relative to overall cohort.
RESULTS: The study analyzed 342 477 patients with an overall mortality rate of 0.32%. A total of 231 977 simple fusions (single approach and <3 levels) experienced a mortality rate of 0.256%; 49 594 complex fusions (combined approach or ≥3 levels) had a mortality rate of 0.534%; and 61 285 decompression-only procedures reported a 0.424% mortality rate, all P < .001 from overall rate. In reporting rates across different demographics, male patients experienced a significantly higher risk for mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.87-4.49), as did black patients (OR, 1.58; CI, 1.32-1.90) and patients over age 75 (OR, 7.55; 95% CI, 6.58-8.65), all P < .001. Patients with liver disease reported 6.40% mortality. Similarly, patients with congestive heart failure (3.91%), cerebrovascular disease (3.41%), and paraplegia (3.79%) experienced high mortality rates, all in cohorts of over 2000 patients, all P < .001. Concurrent in-hospital complications with the highest risk of mortality were shock (OR, 51.41; 95% CI, 24.08-109.76), pulmonary embolism (OR, 25.01; 95% CI, 14.70-42.56), and adult respiratory distress disorder (OR, 14.94; 95% CI, 12.75-17.52), all P < .001.
CONCLUSION: In 342 477 cervical spine surgery patients an overall mortality rate of 0.32% was reported. The rate was 3.91% in a cohort of 5933 patients with congestive heart failure and 3.79% in a cohort of 6947 patients with paraplegia. These findings are consistent with previous estimates and may help counsel patients and improve in-hospital safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical fusion; cervical surgery; mortality

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276085      PMCID: PMC6159738          DOI: 10.14444/5034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  24 in total

1.  Perioperative morbidity and mortality after anterior, posterior, and anterior/posterior spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Vassilios I Vougioukas; Yan Ma; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

Review 3.  Surgeon perceptions and reported complications in spine surgery.

Authors:  Mark B Dekutoski; Daniel C Norvell; Joseph R Dettori; Michael G Fehlings; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Methods and complications of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Robert W Ikard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-10

5.  Trends and complications in cervical spine surgery: 1989-1993.

Authors:  S M Zeidman; T B Ducker; J Raycroft
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-12

6.  Independent predictors of mortality following spine surgery.

Authors:  Rupen Desai; Gautam Nayar; Visakha Suresh; Timothy Y Wang; Daniel Loriaux; Joel R Martin; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Complications and mortality in cervical spine surgery: racial differences.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Roland J Thorpe; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States.

Authors:  Marjorie C Wang; Leighton Chan; Dennis J Maiman; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Safety and effectiveness of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of individual-participant data.

Authors:  Mark C Simmonds; Jennifer V E Brown; Morag K Heirs; Julian P T Higgins; Richard J Mannion; Mark A Rodgers; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the surgical treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: two-year outcomes of Asian prospective randomized controlled multicentre study.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Zhong Jun Liu; Wai Sang Poon; Chun-Kun Park; Ruey-Mo Lin; Kyoung-Suok Cho; Chi Chien Niu; Hung Yi Chen; Sirisha Madhu; Liang Shen; Yu Sun; Wai Kit Mak; Cheng Li Lin; Sang-Bok Lee; Choon Keun Park; Dong Chan Lee; Fu-I Tung; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Gender Disparities in Surgical Treatment of Axis Fractures in Older Adults.

Authors:  Michael P Catalino; Brice A Kessler; Virginia Pate; Drew Cutshaw; Til Stürmer; Deb A Bhowmick
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.