Gautham Prabhakar1, Nicholas Kusnezov2, John Dunn2, Andrew Cleveland2, Joshua Herzog2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The superiority of neurosurgical over orthopaedic spinal procedures is a point of contention. While there is the perception that neurosurgeons are more specifically trained to deal with spinal pathology, no study has directly compared outcomes of spinal surgeries performed by both groups. METHODS: We sought to evaluate the differences in length of surgery, hospital stay, complications, mortality, and readmission for anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) performed by neurosurgeons versus orthopaedic surgeons. RESULTS: 17,967 ACDF procedures were analyzed. Neurosurgeons performed 74.3% of the fusions with a trend towards longer operative times and significantly more patients that were discharged to extended care facilities. There was no significant difference in the length of stay, overall complications, mortality, readmission, or reoperation when comparing the two specialties. CONCLUSION: Despite a significantly higher volume of ACDF performed by neurosurgeons, outcomes are comparable following orthopaedic and neurosurgical procedures.
OBJECTIVE: The superiority of neurosurgical over orthopaedic spinal procedures is a point of contention. While there is the perception that neurosurgeons are more specifically trained to deal with spinal pathology, no study has directly compared outcomes of spinal surgeries performed by both groups. METHODS: We sought to evaluate the differences in length of surgery, hospital stay, complications, mortality, and readmission for anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) performed by neurosurgeons versus orthopaedic surgeons. RESULTS: 17,967 ACDF procedures were analyzed. Neurosurgeons performed 74.3% of the fusions with a trend towards longer operative times and significantly more patients that were discharged to extended care facilities. There was no significant difference in the length of stay, overall complications, mortality, readmission, or reoperation when comparing the two specialties. CONCLUSION: Despite a significantly higher volume of ACDF performed by neurosurgeons, outcomes are comparable following orthopaedic and neurosurgical procedures.
Authors: Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Zareth N Irwin; Alan Hilibrand; Michael Gustavel; Robert McLain; William Shaffer; Mark Myers; John Glaser; Robert A Hart Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Andreea Seicean; Nima Alan; Sinziana Seicean; Duncan Neuhauser; Edward C Benzel; Robert J Weil Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Matthew J McGirt; Saniya S Godil; Anthony L Asher; Scott L Parker; Clinton J Devin Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Philip J Belmont; Gens P Goodman; Nicholas A Kusnezov; Charles Magee; Julia O Bader; Brian R Waterman; Andrew J Schoenfeld Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Matthew Oglesby; Steven J Fineberg; Alpesh A Patel; Miguel A Pelton; Kern Singh Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468