Literature DB >> 24365897

Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.

Han Soo Chang1, Naoaki Fujisawa, Tsukasa Tsuchiya, Soichi Oya, Toru Matsui.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective subcohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis worsens the outcome of patients undergoing unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for lumbar stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The standard surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis with lumbar stenosis is lumbar fusion after standard laminectomy. Although this strategy is widely adopted, it is not supported by class I evidence. This strategy assumes that degenerative spondylolisthesis worsens the outcome of laminectomy by causing postoperative instability. However, instability may be reduced or prevented by the use of less invasive decompression techniques.
METHODS: To test the hypothesis that preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis worsens the outcome of less invasive lumbar decompression, we performed a prospective cohort study of 165 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression at our institution. The patients were prospectively followed with a standardized questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and standing lumbar radiographs for a maximum follow-up period of 5 years. According to the presence or absence of degenerative spondylolisthesis, the patients were divided into 2 groups: an olisthesis group and a nonolisthesis group.
RESULTS: The average 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical score and bodily pain score improved substantially immediately after surgery. This improvement was maintained up to 5 years postoperatively. Progression of slippage was uncommon in both groups, with an overall incidence of 8% at 5 years of follow-up. There was no significant difference in the average physical score, the bodily pain score, or the rate of progression of slippage between the olisthesis and nonolisthesis groups.
CONCLUSION: Our study thus indicates that preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis does not worsen the outcome of patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression. These results suggest that lumbar fusion is often unnecessary in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar stenosis if the posterior decompression technique is unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24365897     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Editorial on "Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries" by Lønne et al.

Authors:  Nils H Ulrich; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

2.  Slip progression in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis following minimally invasive decompression surgery is not associated with increased functional disability.

Authors:  Robert A Ravinsky; Eric J Crawford; Luke A Reda; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Liang; Shu-Hao Liu; Zi-Xian Chen; Qin-Ming Fei
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Ivar M Austevoll; Rolf Gjestad; Jens Ivar Brox; Tore K Solberg; Kjersti Storheim; Frode Rekeland; Erland Hermansen; Kari Indrekvam; Christian Hellum
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgical Outcome of Decompression and Fixation of Degenerative Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis Surgery in Pakistani Population.

Authors:  Muhammad Tahir; Lal Rehman; Iram Bokhari; Syed Ijlal Ahmed; Ali Afzal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-08-26

6.  Commentary on: Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis by Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, et al. NEJM 2016;374 (15):1424-34.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22

7.  Decreased estimated blood loss in lateral trans-psoas versus anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Jayme Koltsov; Tianyi Wang; Grace Xiong; Karthik Nathan; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  Variation in surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in Canada: surgeon assessment of stability and impact on treatment.

Authors:  Charles G Fisher; Y Raja Rampersaud; R Andrew Glennie; Christopher S Bailey; Edward Abraham; Neil Manson; Steve Casha; Kenneth Thomas; Jerome Paquet; Greg McIntosh; Hamiton Hall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Comparison of SDSG and CARDS classifications for L5/S1 lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: an independent inter- and intra-observer agreement study.

Authors:  Zhengwang Sun; Chongqing Xu; Mengchen Yin; Wangjun Yan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Dynamic stabilization for degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal instability.

Authors:  Tatsuya Ohtonari; Nobuharu Nishihara; Katsuyasu Suwa; Taisei Ota; Tsunemaro Koyama
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.