Literature DB >> 30547140

Editorial on "Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries" by Lønne et al.

Nils H Ulrich1, Jakob M Burgstaller1, Johann Steurer1, Mazda Farshad2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID： 30547140      PMCID： PMC6261764          DOI： 10.21037/jss.2018.09.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN： 2414-4630


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Han Soo Chang; Naoaki Fujisawa; Tsukasa Tsuchiya; Soichi Oya; Toru Matsui
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Minimally invasive spinal decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains stability and may avoid the need for fusion.

Authors:  A Minamide; M Yoshida; A K Simpson; Y Nakagawa; H Iwasaki; S Tsutsui; M Takami; H Hashizume; Y Yukawa; H Yamada
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Consensus at last! Long-term results of all randomized controlled trials show that fusion is no better than non-operative care in improving pain and disability in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Jens-Ivar Brox; Jeremy C Fairbank
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 4.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.

Authors:  Albert P Wong; Zachary A Smith; Alexander T Nixon; Cort D Lawton; Nader S Dahdaleh; Ricky H Wong; Brenda Auffinger; Sandi Lam; John K Song; John C Liu; Tyler R Koski; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-02-20

7.  Variation in selection criteria and approaches to surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis among patients treated in Boston and Norway.

Authors:  Greger Lønne; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Thomas D Cha; Øystein P Nygaard; John Anker H Zwart; Tore Solberg
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  The long-term outcome of lumbar fusion in the Swedish lumbar spine study.

Authors:  Rune Hedlund; Christer Johansson; Olle Hägg; Peter Fritzell; Tycho Tullberg
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Arguments for the choice of surgical treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis - a systematic appraisal of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jakob M Burgstaller; François Porchet; Johann Steurer; Maria M Wertli
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Commentary on: Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis by Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, et al. NEJM 2016;374 (15):1424-34.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.