Literature DB >> 31656718

Surgical Outcome of Decompression and Fixation of Degenerative Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis Surgery in Pakistani Population.

Muhammad Tahir1, Lal Rehman2, Iram Bokhari2, Syed Ijlal Ahmed3, Ali Afzal2.   

Abstract

Background Spondylolisthesis is characterized by the slipping of one vertebra, compared with the underlying one, due to structural and degenerative changes. Its origin is multifactorial which includes disc degeneration, facet joint anatomic orientation, iliolumbar configuration, and ligament hyperlaxity. The most common operative treatment is decompression and may require an individualized surgical plan. However, only decompression may progress the slippage which can result in pain or recurrence of neurological complaints. Therefore, lumbar fusion and fixation are considered appropriate to stabilise the spine and prevent delayed deterioration. The aim of our study was to find out the outcome of posterior decompression, with reduction and fixation of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to improve further our results. Methods This study was conducted from July 2013 to February 2017 including 94 patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. The Meyerding classification was used to grade the extent of vertebral slippage. The assessment was done using the ODI. Results There were 50 (53.19%) males and 54 (46.80%) females with a mean age of 44 years ± 10.49 SD. Backache was present in all patients and claudication in 85 (90.42%) patients. There were 10 (10.63%) patients with spondylolisthesis at L3-L4, 36 (38.29%) at L5-S1 and 48 patients (51.06%) at L4-L5 level. In 48 patients with L4-L5 level, 38 (79.16%) were in grade II while six (12.5%) were in grade III. According to the preoperative ODI score, 38 patients were placed in moderate disability, 42 patients were severely disabled while four patients were disabled. Good outcome was achieved in a total of 79 (84.04%) patients. In 40 (42.55%) patients, with complete reduction, the good outcome achieved in 35 (83.33%) while in 22 (23.40%) patients there was no reduction and a good outcome was achieved in 17 (77.27%) patients. In 38 (40.42%) patients with moderate disability, 32 (84.04%) patients had a good outcome. Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred in five (5.31%) and wound infection in seven (7.44%) patients while there was no mortality. Conclusion Reduction with decompression can have a good outcome in spondylolisthesis, and ODI should be used as a predictor of outcome. It also shows that proper decompression is required and not a complete reduction.
Copyright © 2019, Tahir et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  myerding classification; oswestry disability index; spondylolisthesis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656718      PMCID: PMC6812935          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  25 in total

Review 1.  Moving beyond the neutral spine: stabilizing the dancer with lumbar extension dysfunction.

Authors:  Jo Smith
Journal:  J Dance Med Sci       Date:  2009

2.  Clinical presentation and physiotherapy treatment of 4 patients with low back pain and isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Silvano Ferrari; Carla Vanti; Caroline O'Reilly
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2012-06

3.  [POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR DOUBLE-SEGMENTAL BILATERAL ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].

Authors:  Wenhua Xing; Xuejun Yang; Yulong Xiao; Yan Zhao; Yu Fu; Yong Zhu; Feng Li; Daqi Xin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2015-12

4.  Assessment with Oswestry disability index in surgically treated patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: experience in 96 patients.

Authors:  Ibrahim Farooq Pasha; Muhammad Asad Qureshi; Maheen Farooq; Muhammed Talha; Naveed Ahmed; Junaid Ismail
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.781

5.  Surgical treatment in lumbar spondylolisthesis: experience with 45 patients.

Authors:  Ibrahim Farooq Pasha; Muhammed Abid Qureshi; Irfan Zafar Haider; Arsalan Sharif Malik; Muhammad Asad Qureshi; Usama Bin Tahir
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

6.  Increased risk of postoperative neurologic deficit for spinal surgery patients with unobtainable intraoperative evoked potential data.

Authors:  Earl D Thuet; Anne M Padberg; Barry L Raynor; Keith H Bridwell; K Daniel Riew; Brett A Taylor; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Anne F Mannion; Lukas P Staub; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Postoperative spinal wound infections.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Ben J Garrido
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; Valery Berkin; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: A STROBE-compliant observational study.

Authors:  Dapeng Zhang; Keya Mao; Xiaojun Qiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.