Literature DB >> 16011681

Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.

Frank Miller1.   

Abstract

We consider clinical studies with a sample size re-estimation based on the unblinded variance estimation at some interim point of the study. Because the sample size is determined in such a flexible way, the usual variance estimator at the end of the trial is biased. We derive sharp bounds for this bias. These bounds have a quite simple form and can help for the decision if this bias is negligible for the actual study or if a correction should be done. An exact formula for the bias is also provided. We discuss possibilities to get rid of this bias or at least to reduce the bias substantially. For this purpose, we propose a certain additive correction of the bias. We see in an example that the significance level of the test can be controlled when this additive correction is used.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16011681     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00315.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Practical Methods for Bounding Type I Error Rate with an Internal Pilot Design.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; John A Kairalla; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.893

2.  GLUMIP 2.0: SAS/IML Software for Planning Internal Pilots.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.440

3.  Adaptive designs for comparative effectiveness research trials.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Mitchell A Thomann; Ronald I Shorr; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Clin Res Regul Aff       Date:  2014-11-13

4.  Internal pilot design for balanced repeated measures.

Authors:  Xinrui Zhang; Keith E Muller; Maureen M Goodenow; Yueh-Yun Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Study protocol- Lumbar Epidural steroid injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS): a double-blind randomized controlled trial of epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis among older adults.

Authors:  Janna L Friedly; Brian W Bresnahan; Bryan Comstock; Judith A Turner; Richard A Deyo; Sean D Sullivan; Patrick Heagerty; Zoya Bauer; Srdjan S Nedeljkovic; Andrew L Avins; David Nerenz; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  An internal pilot design for prospective cancer screening trials with unknown disease prevalence.

Authors:  John T Brinton; Brandy M Ringham; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Blinded versus unblinded estimation of a correlation coefficient to inform interim design adaptations.

Authors:  Cornelia U Kunz; Nigel Stallard; Nicholas Parsons; Susan Todd; Tim Friede
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.207

8.  Estimation after blinded sample size reassessment.

Authors:  Martin Posch; Florian Klinglmueller; Franz König; Frank Miller
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Are power calculations useful? A multicentre neuroimaging study.

Authors:  John Suckling; Julian Henty; Christine Ecker; Sean C Deoni; Michael V Lombardo; Simon Baron-Cohen; Peter Jezzard; Anna Barnes; Bhismadev Chakrabarti; Cinly Ooi; Meng-Chuan Lai; Steven C Williams; Declan G M Murphy; Edward Bullmore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.