Jason Ramirez1, Robert Miranda. 1. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box S121-5, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Initial lab studies suggest that adolescent drinkers crave alcohol when presented with alcohol cues. Whether this effect generalizes to the natural environment, however, remains unknown, and studies have not examined whether craving predicts drinking among youths. OBJECTIVES: This study builds on existing research by pairing controlled lab-based cue reactivity assessments (CRAs) with data collected in the natural environment using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. We examined whether alcohol cues evoke craving among adolescent drinkers in the lab and natural environment, and tested the clinical relevance of craving during adolescence by examining the prospective association between craving and alcohol use. METHODS: Non-treatment-seeking adolescent drinkers (N = 42; ages 15 to 20 years) completed a lab-based CRA followed by a 1-week EMA monitoring period. During the EMA period, youth were prompted randomly throughout the day to record momentary data on craving and contextual factors (e.g., alcohol cues, peers present). RESULTS: Alcohol cues elicited craving in the lab, and this effect generalized to the natural environment, especially among adolescents with more alcohol problems. In addition, craving predicted subsequent drinking levels in the natural environment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of pairing lab paradigms with EMA methods to better characterize adolescents' reactivity to alcohol cues. Results implicate craving as a clinically meaningful motivator for drinking among adolescents and highlight a potentially important target of pharmacological or behavioral intervention.
RATIONALE: Initial lab studies suggest that adolescent drinkers crave alcohol when presented with alcohol cues. Whether this effect generalizes to the natural environment, however, remains unknown, and studies have not examined whether craving predicts drinking among youths. OBJECTIVES: This study builds on existing research by pairing controlled lab-based cue reactivity assessments (CRAs) with data collected in the natural environment using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods. We examined whether alcohol cues evoke craving among adolescent drinkers in the lab and natural environment, and tested the clinical relevance of craving during adolescence by examining the prospective association between craving and alcohol use. METHODS: Non-treatment-seeking adolescent drinkers (N = 42; ages 15 to 20 years) completed a lab-based CRA followed by a 1-week EMA monitoring period. During the EMA period, youth were prompted randomly throughout the day to record momentary data on craving and contextual factors (e.g., alcohol cues, peers present). RESULTS:Alcohol cues elicited craving in the lab, and this effect generalized to the natural environment, especially among adolescents with more alcohol problems. In addition, craving predicted subsequent drinking levels in the natural environment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of pairing lab paradigms with EMA methods to better characterize adolescents' reactivity to alcohol cues. Results implicate craving as a clinically meaningful motivator for drinking among adolescents and highlight a potentially important target of pharmacological or behavioral intervention.
Authors: Lara A Ray; Robert Miranda; Jennifer W Tidey; John E McGeary; James MacKillop; Chad J Gwaltney; Damaris J Rohsenow; Robert M Swift; Peter M Monti Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2010-02
Authors: D J Rohsenow; P M Monti; A V Rubonis; A D Sirota; R S Niaura; S M Colby; S M Wunschel; D B Abrams Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 1994-06
Authors: Robert Miranda; Stephanie S O'Malley; Hayley Treloar Padovano; Ran Wu; Daniel E Falk; Megan L Ryan; Joanne B Fertig; Thomas H Chun; Srinivas B Muvvala; Raye Z Litten Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Matthew J Worley; Katie Witkiewitz; Sandra A Brown; Daniel R Kivlahan; Richard Longabaugh Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.455