Ethan H Mereish1,2, Hayley Treloar Padovano1, Stephanie Wemm1,3, Robert Miranda4. 1. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box S121-5, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. 2. Department of Health Studies, American University, Washington, DC, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box S121-5, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. Robert_Miranda_Jr@brown.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Drug-related cues evoke craving and stimulate motivational systems in the brain. The acoustic startle reflex captures activation of these motivational processes and affords a unique measure of reactivity to drug cues. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of cannabis-related cues on subjective and eye blink startle reactivity in the human laboratory and tested whether these effects predicted youth's cue-elicited cannabis craving in the natural environment. METHODS: Participants were 55 frequent cannabis users, ages 16 to 24 years (M = 19.9, SD = 1.9; 55% male; 56% met criteria for cannabis dependence), who were recruited from a clinical trial to reduce cannabis use. Eye blink electromyographic activity was recorded in response to acoustic probes that elicited startle reactivity while participants viewed pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cannabis picture cues. Following the startle assessment, participants completed an ecological momentary assessment protocol that involved repeated assessments of cue-elicited craving in real time in their real-world environments. RESULTS: Multilevel models included the presence or absence of visible cannabis cues in the natural environment, startle magnitude, and the cross-level interaction of cues by startle to test whether cue-modulated startle reactivity in the laboratory was associated with cue-elicited craving in the natural environment. Analyses showed that cannabis-related stimuli evoked an appetitive startle response pattern in the laboratory, and this effect was associated with increased cue-elicited craving in the natural environment, b = - 0.15, p = .022, 95% CI [- 0.28, - 0.02]. Pleasant stimuli also evoked an appetitive response pattern, but in this case, blunted response was associated with increased cue-elicited craving in the natural environment, b = 0.27, p < .001, 95% CI [0.12, 0.43]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support cue-modulated startle reactivity as an index of the phenotypic expression of cue-elicited cannabis craving.
RATIONALE: Drug-related cues evoke craving and stimulate motivational systems in the brain. The acoustic startle reflex captures activation of these motivational processes and affords a unique measure of reactivity to drug cues. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of cannabis-related cues on subjective and eye blink startle reactivity in the human laboratory and tested whether these effects predicted youth's cue-elicited cannabis craving in the natural environment. METHODS:Participants were 55 frequent cannabis users, ages 16 to 24 years (M = 19.9, SD = 1.9; 55% male; 56% met criteria for cannabis dependence), who were recruited from a clinical trial to reduce cannabis use. Eye blink electromyographic activity was recorded in response to acoustic probes that elicited startle reactivity while participants viewed pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cannabis picture cues. Following the startle assessment, participants completed an ecological momentary assessment protocol that involved repeated assessments of cue-elicited craving in real time in their real-world environments. RESULTS: Multilevel models included the presence or absence of visible cannabis cues in the natural environment, startle magnitude, and the cross-level interaction of cues by startle to test whether cue-modulated startle reactivity in the laboratory was associated with cue-elicited craving in the natural environment. Analyses showed that cannabis-related stimuli evoked an appetitive startle response pattern in the laboratory, and this effect was associated with increased cue-elicited craving in the natural environment, b = - 0.15, p = .022, 95% CI [- 0.28, - 0.02]. Pleasant stimuli also evoked an appetitive response pattern, but in this case, blunted response was associated with increased cue-elicited craving in the natural environment, b = 0.27, p < .001, 95% CI [0.12, 0.43]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support cue-modulated startle reactivity as an index of the phenotypic expression of cue-elicited cannabis craving.
Authors: Robert Miranda; Lara Ray; Alexander Blanchard; Elizabeth K Reynolds; Peter M Monti; Thomas Chun; Alicia Justus; Robert M Swift; Jennifer Tidey; Chad J Gwaltney; Jason Ramirez Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Sabine Loeber; Bernhard Croissant; Helmut Nakovics; Anke Zimmer; Alexander Georgi; Sabine Klein; Carsten Diener; Andreas Heinz; Karl Mann; Herta Flor Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2007 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Erika A Henry; Jesse T Kaye; Angela D Bryan; Kent E Hutchison; Tiffany A Ito Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 7.853