| Literature DB >> 24359458 |
Tülin Askun, Emmanuel Mouafo Tekwu1, Fatih Satil, Seyma Modanlioglu, Hatice Aydeniz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The global resurgence of tuberculosis is a significant threat. Lamiaceae members have been used in folk remedies for centuries. This study was designed to assess the in-vitro antimycobacterial activity of eighteen crude extracts from six plants (Lamiaceae) and to characterize their phenolic and flavonoid compounds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24359458 PMCID: PMC3878028 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Plant herbarium data according to locality, altitude, collection time, and herbarium number
| 1 | Balikesir, Edremit, Kazdagi National Park | 1400 m | 11 June 2010 | FS1550 | |
| 2 | Sakarya, Akyazı, Davlumbaz plateau | 1300 m | 13 June 2010 | FS1551 | |
| 3 | Balikesir Gomec, Madra | 300 m | 3 June 2010 | FS1552 | |
| 4 | Tekirdag | 1500 m | 20 June 2009 | FS1553 | |
| 5 | Gaziantep, Duluk Forest | 850 m | 15 July 2009 | FS1554 | |
| 6 | Balikesir Edremit, Kazdagi | 450 m | 6 August 2009 | FS1555 |
Antimycobacterial activity (MIC and MBC, μg/ml) of the 18 plant extracts
| PEF | 0,59 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| EAF | 3,02 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| MEF | 6,52 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| PEF | 0,41 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| EAF | 4,87 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| MEF | 11,21 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| PEF | 0,73 | 200 | 400 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 800 | 1600 | 1600 | |
| EAF | 2,30 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| MEF | 8,87 | >6400 | >6400 | nd | nd | - | - | - | - | |
| PEF | 0,61 | 12,5 | 50 | 800 | 400 | 800 | 800 | 800 | 800 | |
| EAF | 3,18 | 12,5 | 12,5 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | |
| MEF | 3,85 | 800 | 200 | 1600 | 800 | >6400 | >6400 | >6400 | >6400 | |
| PEF | 0,58 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| EAF | 3,24 | 12,5 | 12,5 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| MEF | 6,39 | 100 | 400 | 3200 | 1600 | >6400 | >6400 | >6400 | >6400 | |
| PEF | 0,29 | 1600 | 1600 | - | nd* | >6400 | >6400 | - | - | |
| EAF | 2,32 | 100 | 50 | 200 | 400 | >6400 | >6400 | >6400 | >6400 | |
| PEF | 5,26 | 1600 | 1600 | - | - | >6400 | >6400 | - | - | |
| Standard drugs | | | | | | | | | | |
| SM | | 0.63 | 0.63 | 1.25 | 0.63 | - | - | - | - | |
| INH | | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | |
| RIF | | 0.78 | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 6.25 | 3.13 | 6.25 | 6.25 | |
| EMB | 2.73 | 2.73 | 2.73 | 1.37 | - | - | - | - | ||
Nd, not determined due to the fact that the samples were not active on H37Rv and H37Ra; nd*: not determined due to insufficient amount of the sample;(−) not tested; PEF, Petroleum ether fraction; EAF, Ethyl acetate fraction; MEF, Methanol fraction; SM, Streptomycin; INH, Isoniazid; RIF, Rifampicin; EMB, Ethambutol.
Figure 1ESI-TIC-SIM chromatogram of standard phenolics (details according to retention time are given in the Table 3).
Figure 2ESI-TIC SIM chromatogram of A) EAF extract B) MEF extract C) EAF extract D) MEF extract.
LC-MS characteristics of phenolic compounds according to signal no (S.N.), retention times (R.T.) (min), and molecular ions [M-H](m/z) at fragment ion 80 eV
| 1 | 1,6 | 169 | Gallic acid | 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C, |
| 2 | 6,17 | 353 | Chlorogenic acid | 1A,1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 4B, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 3 | 6,53 | 179 | Caffeic acid | 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6B,6C |
| 4 | 7,3 | 197 | Syringic acid | 4C, 2B, 2C, 4B, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 5 | 7,34 | 289 | (−)-Epicatechin | 3C |
| 6 | 8,28 | 163 | ρ-coumaric acid | 1B, 1C, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 6C |
| 7 | 8,9 | 193 | Ferrulic acid | 1C, 2C, 4B, 5B, 6C |
| 8 | 9,72 | 431 | Vitexin | 1C, 2B, 2C, 4B, 5B, 6B, 6C |
| 9 | 10,6 | 359 | Rosmarinic acid | 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 10 | 10,69 | 579 | Naringin | 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3B, 4B, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 11 | 10,76 | 609 | Rutin hidrat | 1B, 1C, 2B, 3B, 3C, 4B, 5B, 6B, 6C |
| 12 | 11,12 | 610 | Hesperidine | 1B, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 13 | 11,65 | 431 | Apigenin 7glikozide | 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 14 | 11,96 | 539 | Oleuropein | 1C, 3C, 4B, 5B, 6B, 6C |
| 15 | 12,57 | 147 | | |
| 16 | 13,47 | 301 | Quercetin | 1C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
| 17 | 13,613 | 271 | (±)-Naringenin | 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6C |
| 18 | 14,36 | 285 | Luteolin | 1B, 1C, 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4B, 4C, 5B, 5C, 6B, 6C |
Chemical concentrations (μg/g) of phenolic of the tested plants in petroleum ether (PEF), ethyl acetate (EAF) and methanol (MEF) extract fractions
| Stm | PEF (A) | * | 35,88 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| MEF (B) | 193,86 | 19821,5 | 1235,31 | * | * | 122,21 | * | * | * | 194,67 | 75,76 | 1690,35 | 5888,53 | * | * | * | 54,01 | 214,67 | |
| EAF (C) | 504,15 | 371,03 | 3422,58 | 310,78 | * | 666,26 | 257,13 | 206,38 | * | 276,64 | 71,33 | * | 1986,35 | 195,20 | * | 68,44 | 285,56 | 1038,67 | |
| Sth | PEF (A) | * | 0,81 | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| MEF (B) | 27,02 | 17965,90 | 2092,20 | 363,51 | * | * | * | 276,36 | 460,80 | 202,86 | 80,34 | * | 1851,75 | * | * | * | 66,17 | 233,10 | |
| EAF (C) | 108,31 | 12192,68 | 5208,54 | 1205,07 | * | 200,43 | 257,56 | 263,55 | 1151,40 | 136,21 | * | * | 1255,18 | * | * | * | 121,72 | 465,49 | |
| Ba | MEF(B) | 18,45 | 6856,7 | 1567,83 | * | * | 144,04 | * | * | 12258,76 | 301,17 | 120,96 | * | 1104,05 | * | * | * | * | 120,51 |
| EAF (C) | 63,11 | 189,34 | 519,04 | * | 330,09 | 160,78 | * | * | 6885,16 | * | 1451,65 | * | 151,11 | 119,81 | * | * | 30,54 | 55,11 | |
| Ts | MEF (B) | 268,9 | 263,86 | 5032,83 | 340,2 | * | 235,97 | 251,6 | 85,24 | 81432,13 | 377,93 | 191,26 | * | 940,27 | 141,95 | * | 645,37 | 452,04 | 3632,13 |
| EAF (C) | 39,15 | * | 1908,9 | * | * | 148,3 | * | * | 6074,77 | * | * | * | 97,8 | * | * | 666,37 | 1436,47 | 2390,07 | |
| Sa | MEF (B) | 53,45 | 234,71 | 1383,2 | 443,75 | * | * | * | 106,01 | 42936,05 | 260,38 | 238,73 | 10117,43 | 389,33 | 551,37 | * | 249,27 | 1084,98 | 2446,5 |
| EAF (C) | 93,78 | 56,14 | 2587,51 | 956,49 | * | 230,23 | 177,14 | * | 26995,81 | 7748,81 | * | 5633 | 282,47 | * | * | 1518,12 | 7729,86 | 5025,99 | |
| Mj | PEF (A) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * |
| MEF (B) | 76,51 | 5256,91 | 1603,05 | 128,17 | * | * | * | 383,28 | 32457,86 | 581 | 5336,78 | 6013,16 | 480,88 | 201,9 | * | 684,28 | * | 242,2 | |
| EAF (C) | 129,07 | 167,96 | 1434,85 | 215,8 | * | 92,85 | 170,23 | 550,55 | 4449,22 | 60,7 | 679,12 | 734,01 | 92,31 | 34,1 | * | 192,37 | 79,92 | 226,36 | |
Stm: Stachys tmolea; Sth: Stachys thirkei Ba: Ballota acetabulosa Ts:Thymus sibthorpii Sa: Satureja aintabensis Mj:Micromeria juliana;EAF: EthylAcetat; MEF: Methanol; 1; Gallicacid 2; Chlorogenicacid 3; Caffeicacid 4; Syringicacid 5; Epicatechin 6; P-coumaricacid 7; Ferrulicacid 8; Vitexin 9; Rosmarinicacid 10; Naringin 11; RutinHidrat 12; Hesperidine 13; Apigenin 7 Glikozide 14; Oleuropein 15; Trans-cinnamicacid 16; Quercetin 17; Naringenin 18; Luteolin, *: Not detected