Literature DB >> 24359099

Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.

Alex Mowat1, Glenn Gardener.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are minimal data involving predictors of success of external cephalic version (ECV) in an Australian healthcare setting. AIMS: To determine the predictors of successful ECV as well as the success rate of ECV and the mode of, and presentation at, delivery for women undergoing ECV for breech presentation from 36-weeks gestation.
METHODS: A prospective review was carried out on all women who had undergone ECV from 36-weeks gestation at the Mater Mothers Hospital over an 8-year period from 2001 to 2008. Data were collected prospectively and were collated in conjunction with database review, chart review and telephonic patient interviews.
RESULTS: A total of 355 women underwent ECV for breech presentation. The overall success rate was 66% (57% for nulliparous, 76% for multiparous). A woman who underwent ECV had a 46% chance of a vaginal birth. If the ECV was successful, she had a 70% chance of vaginal birth. From bivariate analysis, parity, amniotic fluid index (AFI) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were determined to be possible predictors of success of ECV and were included in the logistic regression modelling. In the regression analysis, multiparity increased the odds of successful ECV by 2.18. For every one unit increase in AFI, the odds of successful ECV increased by 1.18.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiparity and amniotic fluid volume as assessed by AFI were the significant predictors of immediate success of ECV. Conversely, lower AFI and nulliparity are factors that are likely to reduce the likelihood of successful ECV.
© 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breech presentation; caesarean section; external cephalic version; mode of delivery; predictors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24359099     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  6 in total

1.  Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version.

Authors:  A Basu; C Flatley; S Kumar
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Sonographic assessment of placental location: a mere notional description or an important key to improve both pregnancy and perinatal obstetrical care? A large cohort study.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Marco Noventa; Amerigo Vitagliano; Michela Quaranta; Valentina Di Giovanni; Shara Borgato; Carlo Saccardi; Donato D'Antona
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

4.  External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving.

Authors:  Raj Lakshmi Nalam; Priya Chinnachamy; Paul Emmanuel
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-02-08

5.  Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Yu Sun Bin; Christine L Roberts; Michael C Nicholl; Jane B Ford
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version.

Authors:  Jun Yi Lee; Yeorae Kim; In Sook Sohn; You Jung Han; Jin Hoon Chung; Moon Young Kim; Min Hyoung Kim; Hyun-Mee Ryu; SungHong Joo; Jung Yeol Han
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.