| Literature DB >> 24358150 |
Tommaso Pippucci1, Antonia Parmeggiani2, Flavia Palombo1, Alessandra Maresca3, Andrea Angius4, Laura Crisponi5, Francesco Cucca6, Rocco Liguori3, Maria Lucia Valentino3, Marco Seri7, Valerio Carelli3.
Abstract
Contribution to epileptic encephalopathy (EE) of mutations in CACNA2D2, encoding α2δ-2 subunit of Voltage Dependent Calcium Channels, is unclear. To date only one CACNA2D2 mutation altering channel functionality has been identified in a single family. In the same family, a rare CELSR3 polymorphism also segregated with disease. Involvement of CACNA2D2 in EE is therefore not confirmed, while that of CELSR3 is questionable. In a patient with epilepsy, dyskinesia, cerebellar atrophy, psychomotor delay and dysmorphic features, offspring to consanguineous parents, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) for homozygosity mapping and mutation detection. WES identified extended autozygosity on chromosome 3, containing two novel homozygous candidate mutations: c.1295delA (p.Asn432fs) in CACNA2D2 and c.G6407A (p.Gly2136Asp) in CELSR3. Gene prioritization pointed to CACNA2D2 as the most prominent candidate gene. The WES finding in CACNA2D2 resulted to be statistically significant (p = 0.032), unlike that in CELSR3. CACNA2D2 homozygous c.1295delA essentially abolished α2δ-2 expression. In summary, we identified a novel null CACNA2D2 mutation associated to a clinical phenotype strikingly similar to the Cacna2d2 null mouse model. Molecular and statistical analyses together argued in favor of a causal contribution of CACNA2D2 mutations to EE, while suggested that finding in CELSR3, although potentially damaging, is likely incidental.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24358150 PMCID: PMC3864908 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Features of the CACNA2D2 and CELSR3 mutations.
| Present work | Edvardson et al., 2013 (11) | |||
| Gene |
|
|
|
|
|
| Novel | Novel | Novel | <0.001 (rs149614835) |
|
| chr3∶50416390 | chr3∶48687978 | chr3∶50402595 | chr3∶48682550 |
|
| c.1295delA | c.341G>A | c.3119A>G | c.7890G>A |
|
| p.N432fs* | p.G114D | p.L1040P | p.M2630I |
|
| – | 5.07 | 4.76 | 5.24 |
|
| – | Tolerated (SIFT) Damaging (MT) Probably Damaging (Polyphen2) | Damaging (SIFT, MT) | Damaging (SIFT, MT) |
§ GERP (Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling) is a measure of the nucleotide evolutionary conservation. It ranges from −12.3 to 6.17, with 6.17 being the most conserved [30].
Figure 1Instrumental findings in the proband.
Left panel: EEG recording during wakefulness showing generalized spike-wave complex at 4 Hz lasting thirteen seconds with absence, eye up deviation and eyelid myoclonia. Right panel: Sagittal T1 MRI showing prominent cerebellar atrophy.
Figure 2Genetic mapping and segregation of CACNA2D2 c.C1295delA mutation.
Upper panel: barcode plot showing EX-HOM on chromosome 3. If the SNP is heterozygous, y = 0, if it is homozygous y = 1. Black bars represent regions of mixed heterozygous/homozygous SNPs, whilst white bars regions of contiguous homozygous SNPs. Different colors reflect the type of mutation: CELSR3 has a missense variant (black), CACNA2D2 has a loss-of-function variant (red). Lower panel: the CACNA2D2 c.C1295delA mutation segregates with the disease in the nuclear pedigree (parents are 1st cousins).
Figure 3CACNA2D2 mRNA and protein expression.
Left panel: the mRNA content of the proband was evaluated by Real Time-PCR and normalized on that of control individuals (n = 4). CACNA2D2 mRNA resulted strongly reduced in the proband (II:1, 18%), father (I:1, 28%) and mother (I:2, 54%) compared to controls (Anova test, p<0.001). Data are shown as mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Right panel: the protein content was evaluated by Western blot and normalized on that of control individuals (n = 3), using GAPDH as reference protein and loading control. Graph shows data obtained by densitometric analysis. The proband (II:1) showed a 3% of protein expression compared to controls (Anova on Ranks test, p = 0.034), whereas both parents (I:1 and I:2) had ∼50% of expression. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Representative western blot is shown.
Calculation of the level of statistical significance of WES findings in candidate genes.
| m (n° variants) |
|
|
|
| 0,999 | 1,000 |
|
|
| 0,109 |