James M Fisher1, Richard W Walker. 1. Department of Medicine, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Rake Lane, North Shields. NE29 8NH, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: simulation-based teaching is increasingly used in medical education, but no studies have evaluated its impact on learning in geriatric medicine. We developed and delivered a simulation teaching session on delirium, falls, elder abuse and breaking bad news. Simulation mannequins, professional role-players and simulated clinical documentation were all incorporated into scenarios. We evaluated the effect of this intervention on student learning and on students' attitudes towards geriatric medicine. METHODS: third year Newcastle University MBBS students at Northumbria base unit received the simulation-based teaching session. Students' knowledge was assessed using a three question test mapped to learning outcomes for the elder abuse, delirium and falls stations. Each student undertook the test on three occasions: the day before the teaching session, immediately after the session and ∼1 month later, allowing evaluation of learning over time. Test scores were also compared with those achieved by another cohort of third year MBBS students at a different base unit, who received traditional ward-based and didactic teaching but no simulation teaching. RESULTS: student knowledge improved significantly after the simulation session and this was maintained when reassessed a month later. Students who received the simulation-based training outperformed those who received usual teaching. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive and the vast majority of students agreed that the session had a positive impact on their perceptions of geriatric medicine. DISCUSSION: our findings demonstrate the efficacy of simulation-based teaching in undergraduate geriatric medicine, its acceptability to students and its positive influence on students' perceptions of the specialty.
BACKGROUND: simulation-based teaching is increasingly used in medical education, but no studies have evaluated its impact on learning in geriatric medicine. We developed and delivered a simulation teaching session on delirium, falls, elder abuse and breaking bad news. Simulation mannequins, professional role-players and simulated clinical documentation were all incorporated into scenarios. We evaluated the effect of this intervention on student learning and on students' attitudes towards geriatric medicine. METHODS: third year Newcastle University MBBS students at Northumbria base unit received the simulation-based teaching session. Students' knowledge was assessed using a three question test mapped to learning outcomes for the elder abuse, delirium and falls stations. Each student undertook the test on three occasions: the day before the teaching session, immediately after the session and ∼1 month later, allowing evaluation of learning over time. Test scores were also compared with those achieved by another cohort of third year MBBS students at a different base unit, who received traditional ward-based and didactic teaching but no simulation teaching. RESULTS: student knowledge improved significantly after the simulation session and this was maintained when reassessed a month later. Students who received the simulation-based training outperformed those who received usual teaching. Student feedback was overwhelmingly positive and the vast majority of students agreed that the session had a positive impact on their perceptions of geriatric medicine. DISCUSSION: our findings demonstrate the efficacy of simulation-based teaching in undergraduate geriatric medicine, its acceptability to students and its positive influence on students' perceptions of the specialty.
Authors: Giuseppe Bellelli; Alessandro Morandi; Marco Trabucchi; Guido Caironi; Daniele Coen; Carlo Fraticelli; Ciro Paolillo; Carolina Prevaldi; Angela Riccardi; Gianfranco Cervellin; Corrado Carabellese; Salvatore Putignano; Stefania Maggi; Antonio Cherubini; Paola Gnerre; Andrea Fontanella; Nicola Latronico; Concezione Tommasino; Antonio Corcione; Giovanni Ricevuti; Nicola Ferrara; Francesco De Filippi; Alberto Ferrari; Mario Guarino; Maria Pia Ruggieri; Pietro Amedeo Modesti; Carlo Locatelli; Patrizia Hrelia; Marco Otto Toscano; Emi Bondi; Antonio Tarasconi; Luca Ansaloni; Francesco Perticone Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: James Michael Fisher; Adam Lee Gordon; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Ellen Tullo; Daniel H J Davis; Adrian Blundell; Robert H Field; Andrew Teodorczuk Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Fernanda F Oliveira; Glaucia R G Benute; Maria Augusta B Gibelli; Nathalia B Nascimento; Tercilia V A Barbosa; Renata Bolibio; Roberta C A Jesus; Paula V V Gaiolla; Maria Silvia V Setubal; Ana L Gomes; Rossana P Francisco; Lisandra Stein Bernardes Journal: Palliat Med Rep Date: 2020-05-28
Authors: Karolina Piotrowicz; Krzysztof Rewiuk; Stanisław Górski; Weronika Kałwak; Barbara Wizner; Agnieszka Pac; Michał Nowakowski; Tomasz Grodzicki Journal: Trials Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 2.279