Literature DB >> 35520982

Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study.

Carole Anne Watkins1, Ellie Higham1, Michael Gilfoyle1, Charley Townley1, Sue Hunter1.   

Abstract

Background: Age simulation can have a positive effect on empathic understanding and perception of ageing. However, there is limited evidence for its ability to replicate objectively the physical and functional challenges of ageing. Objective: To observe whether age suit simulation can replicate in healthy young adults the physical and physiological balance disturbance and falls risk experienced by older adults. Methodology: Healthy young adults aged 20-40 years (16 male) were recruited to the study using convenience sampling from a student population. Participants performed three validated balance tests-Functional Reach Test (FRT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-first without the age suit and then with the age suit, using a standardised protocol, following the same sequence.
Results: 30 participants completed all tests. Statistically significant differences between without-age-suit and with-age-suit performance were recorded for FRT distance (p<0.000005), time taken to complete the TUG (p<0.0005) and BBS score (p<0.001). A comparison of participant scores with normative FRT and TUG scores identified that the suit had 'aged' the majority of participants to the normative values for older adults (60+), with some reaching the values for individuals aged 70-89. However, no scores achieved the values indicative of increased falls risk. Conclusions: The age suit is a valid educational tool that extends the value of age simulation beyond a more general empathising role, enabling those working with an older population to experience and understand the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults as part of their training. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health professions education; simulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 35520982      PMCID: PMC8936969          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  15 in total

Review 1.  Promoting quality of care for older people: developing positive attitudes to working with older people.

Authors:  S Wade
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Simulation suit aids tailored care.

Authors:  Penny Tremayne; Julie Burdett; Cheryl Utecht
Journal:  Nurs Older People       Date:  2011-09

3.  Training and simulation for patient safety.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Oliver T Mytton; Milliard Derbrew; David Hananel; Mark Heydenburg; Barry Issenberg; Catherine MacAulay; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Takeshi Morimoto; Nathaniel Soper; Amitai Ziv; Richard Reznick
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-08

Review 4.  Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Laurence Z Rubenstein
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  The PAUL Suit(©) : an experience of ageing.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Malcolm Moore; John Wenham
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2015-05-29

6.  Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds.

Authors:  Teresa M Steffen; Timothy A Hacker; Louise Mollinger
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-02

7.  Difference in skeletal muscle function in males vs. females: role of estrogen receptor-beta.

Authors:  Birgitta Glenmark; Maria Nilsson; Hui Gao; Jan-Ake Gustafsson; Karin Dahlman-Wright; Håkan Westerblad
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 8.  The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen Downs; Jodie Marquez; Pauline Chiarelli
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.000

9.  The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

Authors:  D Podsiadlo; S Richardson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  The effects of moderate fatigue on dynamic balance control and attentional demands.

Authors:  Martin Simoneau; François Bégin; Normand Teasdale
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.