Literature DB >> 24355290

Assessment of the application of bioanalytical tools as surrogate measure of chemical contaminants in recycled water.

Frederic D L Leusch1, Stuart J Khan2, Somprasong Laingam3, Erik Prochazka4, Suzanne Froscio3, Trang Trinh2, Heather F Chapman4, Andrew Humpage3.   

Abstract

The growing use of recycled water in large urban centres requires comprehensive public health risk assessment and management, an important aspect of which is the assessment and management of residual trace chemical substances. Bioanalytical methods such as in vitro bioassays may be ideal screening tools that can detect a wide range of contaminants based on their biological effect. In this study, we applied thirteen in vitro assays selected explicitly for their ability to detect molecular and cellular effects relevant to potential chemical exposure via drinking water as a means of screening for chemical contaminants from recycled water at 9 Australian water reclamation plants, in parallel to more targeted direct chemical analysis of 39 priority compounds. The selected assays provided measures of primary non-specific (cytotoxicity to various cell types), specific (inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and endocrine receptor-mediated effects) and reactive toxicity (mutagenicity and genotoxicity), as well as markers of adaptive stress response (modulation of cytokine production) and xenobiotic metabolism (liver enzyme induction). Chemical and bioassay analyses were in agreement and complementary to each other: the results show that source water (treated wastewater) contained high levels of biologically active compounds, with positive results in almost all bioassays. The quality of the product water (reclaimed water) was only marginally better after ultrafiltration or dissolved air floatation/filtration, but greatly improved after reverse osmosis often reducing biological activity to below detection limit. The bioassays were able to detect activity at concentrations below current chemical method detection limits and provided a sum measure of all biologically active compounds for that bioassay, thus providing an additional degree of confidence in water quality.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioassay; In vitro; Micropollutant; Water quality; Water reclamation plant; Water recycling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24355290     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  10 in total

1.  Cytotoxic and genotoxic effect of oxyfluorfen on hemocytes of Biomphalaria glabrata.

Authors:  Maíra de Vasconcelos Lima; Williams Nascimento de Siqueira; Hianna Arely Milca Fagundes Silva; José de Melo Lima Filho; Elvis Joacir de França; Ana Maria Mendonça de Albuquerque Melo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  An assessment of endocrine activity in Australian rivers using chemical and in vitro analyses.

Authors:  Philip D Scott; Michael Bartkow; Stephen J Blockwell; Heather M Coleman; Stuart J Khan; Richard Lim; James A McDonald; Helen Nice; Dayanthi Nugegoda; Vincent Pettigrove; Louis A Tremblay; Michael St J Warne; Frederic D L Leusch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  An integrated approach for identifying priority contaminant in the Great Lakes Basin - Investigations in the Lower Green Bay/Fox River and Milwaukee Estuary areas of concern.

Authors:  Shibin Li; Daniel L Villeneuve; Jason P Berninger; Brett R Blackwell; Jenna E Cavallin; Megan N Hughes; Kathleen M Jensen; Zachary Jorgenson; Michael D Kahl; Anthony L Schroeder; Kyle E Stevens; Linnea M Thomas; Matthew A Weberg; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays.

Authors:  Alvine C Mehinto; B Sumith Jayasinghe; Darcy R Vandervort; Nancy D Denslow; Keith A Maruya
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Evaluation of estrogenic activity in the Pearl River by using effect-directed analysis.

Authors:  Xiao -Wen Chen; Jian-Liang Zhao; You-Sheng Liu; Li-Xin Hu; Shuang-Shuang Liu; Guang-Guo Ying
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  An in-vitro approach for water quality determination: activation of NF-κB as marker for cancer-related stress responses induced by anthropogenic pollutants of drinking water.

Authors:  Luis F Spitta; Sebastian Diegeler; Christa Baumstark-Khan; Christine E Hellweg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The recent development of advanced wastewater treatment by ozone and biological aerated filter.

Authors:  Changyong Wu; Yuexi Zhou; Xiumei Sun; Liya Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  In vitro bioassays to evaluate complex chemical mixtures in recycled water.

Authors:  Ai Jia; Beate I Escher; Frederic D L Leusch; Janet Y M Tang; Erik Prochazka; Bingfeng Dong; Erin M Snyder; Shane A Snyder
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  High-Throughput Effect-Directed Analysis Using Downscaled in Vitro Reporter Gene Assays To Identify Endocrine Disruptors in Surface Water.

Authors:  Nick Zwart; Shan Li Nio; Corine J Houtman; Jacob de Boer; Jeroen Kool; Timo Hamers; Marja H Lamoree
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Global Transcriptional Analysis of Nontransformed Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells (FHs 74 Int) after Exposure to Selected Drinking Water Disinfection By-Products.

Authors:  Erik Procházka; Steven D Melvin; Beate I Escher; Michael J Plewa; Frederic D L Leusch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.