Literature DB >> 24981035

An assessment of endocrine activity in Australian rivers using chemical and in vitro analyses.

Philip D Scott1, Michael Bartkow, Stephen J Blockwell, Heather M Coleman, Stuart J Khan, Richard Lim, James A McDonald, Helen Nice, Dayanthi Nugegoda, Vincent Pettigrove, Louis A Tremblay, Michael St J Warne, Frederic D L Leusch.   

Abstract

Studies on endocrine disruption in Australia have mainly focused on wastewater effluents. Limited knowledge exists regarding the relative contribution of different potential sources of endocrine active compounds (EACs) to the aquatic environment (e.g., pesticide run-off, animal farming operations, urban stormwater, industrial inputs). In this study, 73 river sites across mainland Australia were sampled quarterly for 1 year. Concentrations of 14 known EACs including natural and synthetic hormones and industrial compounds were quantified by chemical analysis. EACs were detected in 88 % of samples (250 of 285) with limits of quantification (LOQ) ranging from 0.05 to 20 ng/l. Bisphenol A (BPA; LOQ = 20 ng/l) was the most frequently detected EAC (66 %) and its predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) was exceeded 24 times. The most common hormone was estrone, detected in 28 % of samples (LOQ = 1 ng/l), and the PNEC was also exceeded 24 times. 17α-Ethinylestradiol (LOQ = 0.05 ng/l) was detected in 10 % of samples at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.17 ng/l. It was detected in many samples with no wastewater influence, and the PNEC was exceeded 13 times. In parallel to the chemical analysis, endocrine activity was assessed using a battery of CALUX bioassays. Estrogenic activity was detected in 19 % (53 of 285) of samples (LOQ = 0.1 ng/l 17β-estradiol equivalent; EEQ). Seven samples exhibited estrogenic activity (1-6.5 ng/l EEQ) greater than the PNEC for 17β-estradiol. Anti-progestagenic activity was detected in 16 % of samples (LOQ = 8 ng/l mifepristone equivalents; MifEQ), but the causative compounds are unknown. With several compounds and endocrine activity exceeding PNEC values, there is potential risk to the Australian freshwater ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24981035     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3235-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  67 in total

1.  Optimization and prevalidation of the in vitro AR CALUX method to test androgenic and antiandrogenic activity of compounds.

Authors:  Bart van der Burg; Roos Winter; Hai-yen Man; Clea Vangenechten; Pascale Berckmans; Marc Weimer; Hilda Witters; Sander van der Linden
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Efficacy of an advanced sewage treatment plant in southeast Queensland, Australia, to remove estrogenic chemicals.

Authors:  Frederic D L Leusch; Heather F Chapman; Wolfgang Korner; S Ravi Gooneratne; Louis A Tremblay
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Anal fin morphology and gonadal histopathology in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) exposed to treated municipal sewage effluent.

Authors:  F D L Leusch; H F Chapman; G W Kay; S R Gooneratne; L A Tremblay
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Observations on the estrogenic activity and concentration of 17beta-estradiol in the discharges of 12 wastewater treatment plants in southern australia.

Authors:  C Mispagel; G Allinson; M Allinson; F Shiraishi; M Nishikawa; M R Moore
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Development of a stably transfected estrogen receptor-mediated luciferase reporter gene assay in the human T47D breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  J Legler; C E van den Brink; A Brouwer; A J Murk; P T van der Saag; A D Vethaak; B van der Burg
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Pharmaceutical metabolites in the environment: analytical challenges and ecological risks.

Authors:  Mary D Celiz; Jerry Tso; Diana S Aga
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Contamination of headwater streams in the United Kingdom by oestrogenic hormones from livestock farms.

Authors:  P Matthiessen; D Arnold; A C Johnson; T J Pepper; T G Pottinger; K G T Pulman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Determination of phenolic and steroid endocrine disrupting compounds in environmental matrices.

Authors:  Anastasia Arditsoglou; Dimitra Voutsa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen.

Authors:  Karen A Kidd; Paul J Blanchfield; Kenneth H Mills; Vince P Palace; Robert E Evans; James M Lazorchak; Robert W Flick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Predicted exposures to steroid estrogens in U.K. rivers correlate with widespread sexual disruption in wild fish populations.

Authors:  Susan Jobling; Richard Williams; Andrew Johnson; Ayesha Taylor; Melanie Gross-Sorokin; Monique Nolan; Charles R Tyler; Ronny van Aerle; Eduarda Santos; Geoff Brighty
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  11 in total

1.  Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays.

Authors:  Alvine C Mehinto; B Sumith Jayasinghe; Darcy R Vandervort; Nancy D Denslow; Keith A Maruya
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  A multi-residue method for determination of 70 organic micropollutants in surface waters by solid-phase extraction followed by gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Evangelia Terzopoulou; Dimitra Voutsa; George Kaklamanos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  (Anti-)estrogenic and (anti-)androgenic effects in wastewater during advanced treatment: comparison of three in vitro bioassays.

Authors:  Linda Gehrmann; Helena Bielak; Maximilian Behr; Fabian Itzel; Sven Lyko; Anne Simon; Gotthard Kunze; Elke Dopp; Martin Wagner; Jochen Tuerk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comparison of UV photolysis, nanofiltration, and their combination to remove hormones from a drinking water source and reduce endocrine disrupting activity.

Authors:  Sandra Sanches; Alexandre Rodrigues; Vitor V Cardoso; Maria J Benoliel; João G Crespo; Vanessa J Pereira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  A structural perspective on nuclear receptors as targets of environmental compounds.

Authors:  Vanessa Delfosse; Albane le Maire; Patrick Balaguer; William Bourguet
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Active and passive sampling for the assessment of hydrophilic organic contaminants in a river basin-ecotoxicological risk assessment.

Authors:  Evangelia Terzopoulou; Dimitra Voutsa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  The Urban River Syndrome: Achieving Sustainability Against a Backdrop of Accelerating Change.

Authors:  Martin Richardson; Mikhail Soloviev
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Vitellogenin induction in caudal fin of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) as a less invasive and sensitive biomarker for environmental estrogens.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Shuwei Ma; Zhenzhong Zhang; Mingyi Zheng; Yifei Dong; Shaoguo Ru
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Adsorption Removal of 17β-Estradiol from Water by Rice Straw-Derived Biochar with Special Attention to Pyrolysis Temperature and Background Chemistry.

Authors:  Xiaohua Wang; Ni Liu; Yunguo Liu; Luhua Jiang; Guangming Zeng; Xiaofei Tan; Shaobo Liu; Zhihong Yin; Sirong Tian; Jiang Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.