PURPOSE: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a significant patient safety concern associated with poor quality of care. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the relationship between ED crowding and patient outcomes. DESIGN: We searched the Medline search engine and relevant emergency medicine and nursing journals for studies published in the past decade that pertained to ED crowding and the following patient outcome measures: mortality, morbidity, patient satisfaction, and leaving the ED without being seen. All articles were appraised for study quality. FINDINGS: A total of 196 abstracts were screened and 11 articles met inclusion criteria. Three of the eleven studies reported a significant positive relationship between ED crowding and mortality either among patients admitted to the hospital or discharged home. Five studies reported that ED crowding is associated with higher rates of patients leaving the ED without being seen. Measures of ED crowding varied across studies. CONCLUSIONS: ED crowding is a major patient safety concern associated with poor patient outcomes. Interventions and policies are needed to address this significant problem. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This review details the negative patient outcomes associated with ED crowding. Study results are relevant to medical professionals and those that seek care in the ED.
PURPOSE: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a significant patient safety concern associated with poor quality of care. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the relationship between ED crowding and patient outcomes. DESIGN: We searched the Medline search engine and relevant emergency medicine and nursing journals for studies published in the past decade that pertained to ED crowding and the following patient outcome measures: mortality, morbidity, patient satisfaction, and leaving the ED without being seen. All articles were appraised for study quality. FINDINGS: A total of 196 abstracts were screened and 11 articles met inclusion criteria. Three of the eleven studies reported a significant positive relationship between ED crowding and mortality either among patients admitted to the hospital or discharged home. Five studies reported that ED crowding is associated with higher rates of patients leaving the ED without being seen. Measures of ED crowding varied across studies. CONCLUSIONS: ED crowding is a major patient safety concern associated with poor patient outcomes. Interventions and policies are needed to address this significant problem. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This review details the negative patient outcomes associated with ED crowding. Study results are relevant to medical professionals and those that seek care in the ED.
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Joshua A Hilton; Ellen J Weber; Annechien J Alkemade; Hasan Al Shabanah; Philip D Anderson; Michael Bernhard; Alessio Bertini; André Gries; Santiago Ferrandiz; Vijaya Arun Kumar; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Barbara Hogan; Bo Madsen; Suzanne Mason; Gunnar Ohlén; Timothy Rainer; Niels Rathlev; Eric Revue; Drew Richardson; Mehdi Sattarian; Michael J Schull Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Peter B Smulowitz; Robert Lipton; J Frank Wharam; Leon Adelman; Scott G Weiner; Laura Burke; Christopher W Baugh; Jeremiah D Schuur; Shan W Liu; Meghan E McGrath; Bella Liu; Assaad Sayah; Mary C Burke; J Hector Pope; Bruce E Landon Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jesse M Pines; A Russell Localio; Judd E Hollander; William G Baxt; Hoi Lee; Carolyn Phillips; Joshua P Metlay Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Chad Garson; William G Baxt; Karin V Rhodes; Frances S Shofer; Judd E Hollander Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Charles V Pollack; Deborah B Diercks; Anna Marie Chang; Frances S Shofer; Judd E Hollander Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Carl O Eriksson; Ryan C Stoner; Karen B Eden; Craig D Newgard; Jeanne-Marie Guise Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christopher D King; Victoria W Joyce; Carol C Nash; Ralph J Buonopane; Anthony D Sossong; Kerry J Ressler Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Pere Llorens; Patricia Javaloyes; Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez; Javier Jacob; Pablo Herrero-Puente; Víctor Gil; José Manuel Garrido; Eva Salvo; Marta Fuentes; Héctor Alonso; Fernando Richard; Francisco Javier Lucas; Héctor Bueno; John Parissis; Christian E Müller; Òscar Miró Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Judith W Dexheimer; Huaxiu Tang; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Melanie Hounchell; Stephanie Kennebeck; Imre Solti; Yizhao Ni Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Hannah R Roncallo; Jessica M Ray; Regina C Kulacz; Thomas J Yang; Christopher Chmura; Leigh V Evans; Ambrose H Wong Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2020-08-16
Authors: M Christien van der Linden; Crispijn L van den Brand; Ido R van den Wijngaard; Roeline A Y de Beaufort; Naomi van der Linden; Korné Jellema Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 4.849