Literature DB >> 24353303

Electrical noise modulates perception of electrical pulses in humans: sensation enhancement via stochastic resonance.

Fivos Iliopoulos1, Till Nierhaus, Arno Villringer.   

Abstract

Although noise is usually considered to be harmful for signal detection and information transmission, stochastic resonance (SR) describes the counterintuitive phenomenon of noise enhancing the detection and transmission of weak input signals. In mammalian sensory systems, SR-related phenomena may arise both in the peripheral and the central nervous system. Here, we investigate behavioral SR effects of subliminal electrical noise stimulation on the perception of somatosensory stimuli in humans. We compare the likelihood to detect near-threshold pulses of different intensities applied on the left index finger during presence vs. absence of subliminal noise on the same or an adjacent finger. We show that (low-pass) noise can enhance signal detection when applied on the same finger. This enhancement is strong for near-threshold pulses below the 50% detection threshold and becomes stronger when near-threshold pulses are applied as brief trains. The effect reverses at pulse intensities above threshold, especially when noise is replaced by subliminal sinusoidal stimulation, arguing for a peripheral direct current addition. Unfiltered noise applied on longer pulses enhances detection of all pulse intensities. Noise applied to an adjacent finger has two opposing effects: an inhibiting effect (presumably due to lateral inhibition) and an enhancing effect (most likely due to SR in the central nervous system). In summary, we demonstrate that subliminal noise can significantly modulate detection performance of near-threshold stimuli. Our results indicate SR effects in the peripheral and central nervous system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection enhancement; perception modulation; somatosensoric threshold; subliminal electrical noise stimulation; unconscious noise

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24353303     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00392.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  Sinusoidal vibrotactile stimulation differentially improves force steadiness depending on contraction intensity.

Authors:  Carina Marconi Germer; Luciana Sobral Moreira; Leonardo Abdala Elias
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Weak electric fields detectability in a noisy neural network.

Authors:  Jia Zhao; Bin Deng; Yingmei Qin; Cong Men; Jiang Wang; Xile Wei; Jianbing Sun
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS) Shapes the Processing of Rapidly Changing Auditory Information.

Authors:  Katharina S Rufener; Philipp Ruhnau; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Tino Zaehle
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  Stochastic resonance improves visuomotor temporal integration in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Michihiro Osumi; Atsushi Matsuo; Takahiro Fukuchi; Akio Nakai; Takuro Zama; Sotaro Shimada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Claudio Zippenfennig; Laura Niklaus; Katrin Karger; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2018-10-24

6.  Stochastic resonance stimulation improves balance in children with cerebral palsy: a case control study.

Authors:  Anastasia Zarkou; Samuel C K Lee; Laura A Prosser; Sungjae Hwang; John Jeka
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Vibrotactile sensitivity of patients with HIV-related sensory neuropathy: An exploratory study.

Authors:  David Karpul; Sarah McIntyre; André van Schaik; Paul P Breen; Jeannine M Heckmann
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Analysis of the Effectiveness of Sub-sensory Electrical Noise Stimulation During Visuomotor Adaptations in Different Visual Feedback Conditions.

Authors:  Anna Margherita Castronovo; Ciara Giles Doran; Méabh Holden; Giacomo Severini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-06

9.  Differential effects of white noise in cognitive and perceptual tasks.

Authors:  Nora A Herweg; Nico Bunzeck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-03

10.  Stochastic Resonance Reduces Sway and Gait Variability in Individuals With Unilateral Transtibial Amputation: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Aaron D Likens; Jenny A Kent; C Ian Sloan; Shane R Wurdeman; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.