Literature DB >> 24352959

Effects of decreased dietary roughage concentration on energy metabolism and nutrient balance in finishing beef cattle.

K E Hales1, T M Brown-Brandl, H C Freetly.   

Abstract

The optimal roughage concentration required in feedlot diets changes continuously for many reasons such as source, availability, price, and interaction with other ingredients in the diet. Wet distillers grains and solubles (WDGS) are common in finishing diets and they contain relatively high amounts of fiber compared with other grains they replace. Therefore, concentration of roughage could be altered when WDGS are included in feedlot diets. There has been very little data published regarding the effects of roughage concentration on energy metabolism and nutrient balance in beef steers. Therefore, the effects of roughage concentration in dry-rolled corn (DRC)-based diets containing 25% WDGS were evaluated in 8 steers (BW = 362 ± 3.71 kg) using a replicated Latin square. Data were analyzed with the fixed effects of dietary treatment and period and random effects of square and steer within square were included in the model. Diets consisted of 25% WDGS and the balance being DRC and coarsely ground alfalfa hay (AH) replacing corn at 2% (AH-2), 6% (AH-6), 10% (AH-10), and 14% (AH-14) of dietary dry matter. As a proportion of GE intake, fecal energy loss increased linearly (P = 0.02), and DE decreased linearly (P = 0.02) as dietary level of AH increased. Methane energy loss, as a proportion of GE intake, increased linearly (P < 0.01) and ME decreased linearly (P < 0.01) as dietary concentration of AH increased. Heat production tended (P = 0.10) to decrease reaching a minimum of 10% AH and increased from 10 to 14% AH inclusion. Moreover, as a proportion of GE intake, retained energy (RE) decreased (P < 0.01) as AH level increased in the diet. Reasons for the decrease in RE are 1) the increase in fecal energy loss that is associated with decreased ruminal digestibility of NDF when AH replaced DRC and the shift in ruminal VFA produced, 2) the decreased energy available for animal retention when NDF increased linearly as AH increased in the diet, and 3) the methane and heat energy associated with digestion of the fibrous portion of the AH. Neutral detergent fiber and OM excretion also increased linearly (P < 0.01) with increasing AH in the diet. The increased NDF and OM excretion were likely caused by the difference in digestibility of AH and DRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352959     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Multivariate relationship between the nitrogen excretion and the protein and fiber utilization in hair sheep fed Mombasa grass silage mixed with açai palm seeds.

Authors:  Julián Andrés Castillo Vargas; Victória Fideles Silva Santos; Tamara Nayanne Matos Lustosa; Kaliandra Souza Alves; Raylon Pereira Maciel; Daiany Iris Gomes; Rafael Mezzomo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?1.

Authors:  Emily A Petzel; Evan C Titgemeyer; Alexander J Smart; Kristin E Hales; Andrew P Foote; Subash Acharya; Eric A Bailey; Jeffrey E Held; Derek W Brake
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Impacts of added roughage on growth performance, digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and ruminal pH of feedlot steers fed wheat-based feedlot diets containing 30% modified distillers grains with solubles.

Authors:  Wayde J Pickinpaugh; Bryan W Neville; Rebecca L Moore; Joel S Caton
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

4.  Effects of quebracho tannin extract on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation, and methane production in crossbred heifers fed low-quality tropical grass.

Authors:  A T Piñeiro-Vázquez; G Jiménez-Ferrer; J A Alayon-Gamboa; A J Chay-Canul; A J Ayala-Burgos; C F Aguilar-Pérez; J C Ku-Vera
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  The effects of the forage-to-concentrate ratio on the conversion of digestible energy to metabolizable energy in growing beef steers.

Authors:  Amanda L Fuller; Tryon A Wickersham; Jason E Sawyer; Harvey C Freetly; Tami M Brown-Brandl; Kristin E Hales
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The effects of feeding ferric citrate on ruminal bacteria, methanogenic archaea and methane production in growing beef steers.

Authors:  Brooke A Clemmons; Liesel G Schneider; Emily A Melchior; Amanda K Lindholm-Perry; Kristin E Hales; James E Wells; Harvey C Freetly; Stephanie L Hansen; Mary E Drewnoski; Sarah J Hartman; Phillip R Myer
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-23

7.  Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency.

Authors:  Phillip R Myer; Timothy P L Smith; James E Wells; Larry A Kuehn; Harvey C Freetly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of a model to predict dietary metabolizable energy from digestible energy in beef cattle.

Authors:  Seongwon Seo; Kyewon Kang; Seoyoung Jeon; Mingyung Lee; Sinyong Jeong; Luis Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

9.  Effect of condensed tannins from Leucaena leucocephala on rumen fermentation, methane production and population of rumen protozoa in heifers fed low-quality forage.

Authors:  Angel T Piñeiro-Vázquez; Jorge R Canul-Solis; Guillermo O Jiménez-Ferrer; José A Alayón-Gamboa; Alfonso J Chay-Canul; Armin J Ayala-Burgos; Carlos F Aguilar-Pérez; Juan C Ku-Vera
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Effects of roughage type on particle separation, rumination, fiber mat characteristics, in situ degradation, and ruminal fermentation parameters in beef steers.

Authors:  Catherine L Lockard; Caleb G Lockard; Wyatt N Smith; Kendall J Karr; Ben P Holland; Alyssa B Word; Jamie L Foster; Jenny S Jennings
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.