Literature DB >> 34270695

Effects of roughage type on particle separation, rumination, fiber mat characteristics, in situ degradation, and ruminal fermentation parameters in beef steers.

Catherine L Lockard1, Caleb G Lockard1, Wyatt N Smith1, Kendall J Karr2, Ben P Holland2, Alyssa B Word2, Jamie L Foster3, Jenny S Jennings1.   

Abstract

Six ruminally cannulated steers (average BW = 791 ± 71 kg) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square experiment to determine the effects of roughage type on rumination, fiber mat characteristics, and rumen fermentation variables. Three roughages were included at 7% (DM basis) in a steam flaked corn-based diet: cotton burrs (CB), wheat silage (WS), or corn stalks (CS). Steers were fitted with a sensory collar to record rumination behaviors in 2-h intervals at the beginning of the experiment. Each 30-d period consisted of 7 d of recovery, 14 d of diet adaptation, 7 d of rumination data collection (daily and bi-hourly average rumination), 1 d of rumen fluid collection, and 1 d of rumen evacuations. In situ degradation of individual roughages was determined for 4 d after period 3 evacuations. During rumen evacuations, ruminal contents were removed; the rumen fiber mat (RF) was separated from the liquid portion with a 2-mm sieve, weighed, and a subsample was dried. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with steer as the experimental unit and roughage (CB, WS, and CS) as the main effect. Dry matter intake (DMI) was not different for CB and WS (P = 0.25) and greatest for steers consuming CS diet (P ≤ 0.01). Roughage type did not influence the weight of the RF dry matter (%; DM; P = 0.92), RF weight (P = 0.69), or RF:DMI ratio (P = 0.29). Daily rumination (min/d) did not differ among roughages (P = 0.40), but min of rumination/kg of DMI was greatest for CS (18.0 min), min/kg of NDF was greatest for WS (89.8 min; P = 0.02), and min/kg of peNDF was greatest for CS (132.4 min; P ≤ 0.01). Wheat silage had the greatest percentage of soluble and degradable DM. Rumen fiber mat did not differ for roughages, although rumination min/kg of DMI and peNDF was greatest for steers consuming CS and WS. In situ degradation determined that CB-R and CS-R had the greatest percentage of ruminal undegraded DM. Based on the objective of the experiment, roughage type did not influence daily rumination or fiber mat characteristics.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; corn stalks; cotton burrs; fiber; roughage source; wheat silage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34270695      PMCID: PMC8763226          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  15 in total

1.  Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements.

Authors:  P J Kononoff; A J Heinrichs; D R Buckmaster
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Effects of source and level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on feed intake, ruminal fermentation, ruminal digestion in situ, and total tract digestion in beef cattle fed pelleted concentrates with or without supplemental roughage.

Authors:  S A Marshall; C P Campbell; I B Mandell; J W Wilton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of decreased dietary roughage concentration on energy metabolism and nutrient balance in finishing beef cattle.

Authors:  K E Hales; T M Brown-Brandl; H C Freetly
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Efficiency of converting digestible energy to metabolizable energy and reevaluation of the California Net Energy System maintenance requirements and equations for predicting dietary net energy values for beef cattle.

Authors:  M L Galyean; N A Cole; L O Tedeschi; M E Branine
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Physically effective fiber: method of determination and effects on chewing, ruminal acidosis, and digestion by dairy cows.

Authors:  W Z Yang; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effects of utilizing cotton byproducts in a finishing diet on beef cattle performance, carcass traits, fecal characteristics, and plasma metabolites.

Authors:  Andrea L Warner; Paul A Beck; Andrew P Foote; Kaitlyn N Pierce; Colton A Robison; Don S Hubbell; Blake K Wilson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of source and concentration of neutral detergent fiber from roughage in beef cattle diets: Comparison of methods to measure the effectiveness of fiber.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Goulart; Ricardo A M Vieira; Joao L P Daniel; Rafael C Amaral; Vanessa P Santos; Sergio G Toledo Filho; Edward H Cabezas-Garcia; Luis O Tedeschi; Luiz Gustavo Nussio
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Quantity and characteristics of microorganisms associated with ruminal fluid or particles.

Authors:  J A Olubobokun; W M Craig
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Studies on the metabolic function of branched-chain volatile fatty acids, growth factors for ruminococci. I. Incorporation of isovalerate into leucine.

Authors:  M J ALLISON; M P BRYANT; R N DOETSCH
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Influence of mass of ruminal contents on voluntary intake and digesta passage in steers fed a forage and a concentrate diet.

Authors:  M S Whetsell; E C Prigge; E L Nestor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impacts of including Sweet Bran and wet distillers grains with solubles alone or in combination in finishing cattle diets on physically effective fiber concentrations and rumen buffering characteristics of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Paige R Spowart; John T Richeson; David M Crawford; Kendall L Samuelson
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.