Literature DB >> 32697829

The effects of the forage-to-concentrate ratio on the conversion of digestible energy to metabolizable energy in growing beef steers.

Amanda L Fuller1, Tryon A Wickersham1, Jason E Sawyer1, Harvey C Freetly2, Tami M Brown-Brandl2, Kristin E Hales2,3.   

Abstract

Metabolizable energy (ME) is calculated from digestible energy (DE) using a constant conversion factor of 0.82. Methane and urine energy losses vary across diets and dry matter intake (DMI), suggesting that a static conversion factor fails to describe the biology. To quantify the effects of the forage-to-concentrate ratio (F:C) on the efficiency of conversion of DE to ME, 10 Angus steers were used in a 5 × 5 replicated Latin square. Dry-rolled corn was included in experimental diets at 0%, 22.5%, 45.0%, 67.5%, and 83.8% on a dry matter (DM) basis, resulting in a high F:C (HF:C), intermediate F:C (IF:C), equal F:C (EF:C), low F:C (LF:C), and a very low F:C (VLF:C), respectively. Each experimental period consisted of a 23-d diet adaption followed by 5 d of total fecal and urine collections and a 24-h gas exchange collection. Contrasts were used to test the linear and quadratic effects of the F:C. There was a tendency (P = 0.06) for DMI to increase linearly as F:C decreased. As a result, gross energy intake (GEI) increased linearly (P = 0.04) as F:C decreased. Fecal energy loss expressed as Mcal/d (P = 0.02) or as a proportion of GEI (P < 0.01) decreased as F:C decreased, such that DE (Mcal/d and Mcal/kg) increased linearly (P < 0.01) as F:C decreased. As a proportion of GEI, urine energy decreased linearly (P = 0.03) as F:C decreased. Methane energy loss as a proportion of GEI responded quadratically (P < 0.01), increasing from HF:C to IF:C then decreasing thereafter. The efficiency of DE to ME conversion increased quadratically (P < 0.01) as F:C decreased, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92. Heat production (Mcal) increased linearly (P < 0.04) as F:C decreased but was not different as a proportion of GEI (P ≥ 0.22). As a proportion of GEI, retained energy responded quadratically (P = 0.03), decreasing from HF:C to IF:C and increasing thereafter. DM, organic matter, and neutral detergent fiber digestibility increased linearly (P < 0.01) and starch digestibility decreased linearly (P < 0.01) as the F:C decreased. Total N retained tended to increase linearly as the proportion of concentrate increased in the diet (P = 0.09). In conclusion, the efficiency of conversion of DE to ME increased with decreasing F:C due to decreasing methane and urine energy loss. The relationship between DE and ME is not static, especially when differing F:C. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; digestible energy; metabolizable energy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32697829      PMCID: PMC7431208          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?

Authors:  J B Russell; D B Wilson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 3.  BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Efficiency of converting digestible energy to metabolizable energy and reevaluation of the California Net Energy System maintenance requirements and equations for predicting dietary net energy values for beef cattle.

Authors:  M L Galyean; N A Cole; L O Tedeschi; M E Branine
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  The effect of energy supplementation on nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows fed grass silage diets.

Authors:  A R Castillo; E Kebreab; D E Beever; J H Barbi; J D Sutton; H C Kirby; J France
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of pH and energy spilling on bacterial protein synthesis by carbohydrate-limited cultures of mixed rumen bacteria.

Authors:  H J Strobel; J B Russell
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effects of increasing concentrations of wet distillers grains with solubles in steam-flaked, corn-based diets on energy metabolism, carbon-nitrogen balance, and methane emissions of cattle.

Authors:  K E Hales; N A Cole; J C MacDonald
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Evaluation of nitrogen and organic matter balance in the feedlot as affected by level and source of dietary fiber.

Authors:  S Bierman; G E Erickson; T J Klopfenstein; R A Stock; D H Shain
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effects of calcium magnesium carbonate and roughage level on feedlot performance, ruminal metabolism, and site and extent of digestion in steers fed high-grain diets.

Authors:  G I Crawford; C D Keeler; J J Wagner; C R Krehbiel; G E Erickson; M B Crombie; G A Nunnery
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting metabolizable energy from digestible energy for growing and finishing beef cattle and relationships to the prediction of methane.

Authors:  Kristin E Hales; Carley A Coppin; Zachary K Smith; Zach S McDaniel; Luis O Tedeschi; N Andy Cole; Michael L Galyean
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Enteric methane mitigation interventions.

Authors:  Julia Q Fouts; Mallory C Honan; Breanna M Roque; Juan M Tricarico; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Development of a model to predict dietary metabolizable energy from digestible energy in beef cattle.

Authors:  Seongwon Seo; Kyewon Kang; Seoyoung Jeon; Mingyung Lee; Sinyong Jeong; Luis Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.