| Literature DB >> 24352945 |
Takeshi Miki1, Taichi Yokokawa, Kazuaki Matsui.
Abstract
Ecosystems have a limited buffering capacity of multiple ecosystem functions against biodiversity loss (i.e. low multifunctional redundancy). We developed a novel theoretical approach to evaluate multifunctional redundancy in a microbial community using the microbial genome database (MBGD) for comparative analysis. In order to fully implement functional information, we defined orthologue richness in a community, each of which is a functionally conservative evolutionary unit in genomes, as an index of community multifunctionality (MF). We constructed a graph of expected orthologue richness in a community (MF) as a function of species richness (SR), fit the power function to SR (i.e. MF = cSR(a)), and interpreted the higher exponent a as the lower multifunctional redundancy. Through a microcosm experiment, we confirmed that MF defined by orthologue richness could predict the actual multiple functions. We simulated random and non-random community assemblages using full genomic data of 478 prokaryotic species in the MBGD, and determined that the exponent in microbial communities ranged from 0.55 to 0.75. This exponent range provided a quantitative estimate that a 6.6-8.9% loss limit in SR occurred in a microbial community for an MF reduction no greater than 5%, suggesting a non-negligible initial loss effect of microbial diversity on MF.Entities:
Keywords: accumulation curve; ecosystem function; microbial diversity; multifunctional redundancy; orthologue richness; species loss
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24352945 PMCID: PMC3871314 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.Relationship between genome size and orthologue richness. (a) Species sequence size versus orthologue number. Bacteria and Archaea are represented by black dots and open rectangles, respectively. Species regression line is log (orthologue number) = −4.618 + 0.832 × log (species sequence size) (r = 0.955, p < 0.001). (b) Community sequence size versus orthologue number. Community sequence size was calculated for communities generated by resampling methods (see the electronic supplementary material, appendix S2 for more detail) for the orthologue accumulation curve of a prokaryotic community (results are shown as small dots). Community regression line (solid line) is log (orthologue) = −2.475 + 0.689 × log (community sequence size) (r = 0.998, p < 0.001). The regression line for species is also shown as a dashed line.
Figure 2.(a) Group-dependent exponent and (b) intercept from the log–log regression and comparison with randomly assembled communities. OTU classification into groups is shown in the electronic supplementary material, table S1. B, Bacteria; A, Archaea; B_A, B + A; Tr, terrestrial; Aq, aquatic; Tr_Aq, terrestrial and aquatic; Fw, freshwater; Mr, marine; Ds, deep sea; Sd, aquatic sediment; Sd_M, marine sediment; Sd_F, freshwater sediment; Pc, plant commensalism; Ac, animal commensalism; Pp, plant parasitism; Ap, animal parasitism; Ht, high temperature; Lt, low temperature; Hp, halophilic; An, anaerobic; Aer, aerobic; Facl, facultative; T_t, Tr_Aq + Tr; Aq_t, Tr_Aq + Fw + Mr + Aq + Ds; Sd_t, Sd + Sd_M + Sd_F; Syt. Pc + Ac + Pp + Ap; Ex_t, Ht + Lt + Hp. The upper and lower lines represent middle 95% CI ranges from 1000 permutations of randomly assembled communities. TrH, ocean1, ocean2, lake and pond are the results from the microbial communities described in the electronic supplementary material, tables S2–S6, respectively.
Figure 3.Multifunctional redundancy (exponent a) dependence of the prokaryotic community (SR = 478) on the orthologue ratio randomly chosen in simulations from 197 061 orthologues. In 10–99% of cases, the median values from 200 permutations of randomly chosen orthologues are shown. Only median values are indicated because variation among the 200 permutations was very small. The maximum and minimum values among 200 permutations were very close to the median value (i.e. approx. 0.1% from the median).
Figure 4.Multifunctionality predicted by orthologue-richness reduction. The effect of orthologue richness reduction on the average number of functions achieved above thresholds (T), where T is the quantile-based ranking of each function across all treatments in each experiment date. Results where T were based on the average functioning were qualitatively similar (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S2). p-values from simple linear least-squares regression are < 0.01 (T = 0.5), < 0.05 (T = 0.6), < 0.001 (T = 0.1, 0.2, 0.4), < 10−4 (T = 0.3), 0.087 (T = 0.7), 0.12 (T = 0.9) and 0.21 (T = 0.8), respectively. n.s., non-significant (p > 0.05).
Reduction level estimates for no. sp. (%), which is equivalent to reduction in no. orthologue (y) 1%, 5% and 10%. (Exponent (a) values cover a broader range than those shown in the figure 2 for precautionary purposes. Note that most exponent values shown in figure 2 are greater than 0.60.)
| reduction of | reduction of no. sp. (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.75 | |
| 1 | 1.8174 | 1.6611 | 1.53431 | 1.4255 | 1.33111 |
| 5 | 8.90439 | 8.19366 | 7.58795 | 7.06558 | 6.61048 |
| 10 | 17.4334 | 16.1047 | 14.9638 | 13.9735 | 13.106 |