Literature DB >> 24347643

Spontaneous slow replication fork progression elicits mitosis alterations in homologous recombination-deficient mammalian cells.

Therese Wilhelm1, Indiana Magdalou, Aurélia Barascu, Hervé Técher, Michelle Debatisse, Bernard S Lopez.   

Abstract

Homologous recombination deficient (HR(-)) mammalian cells spontaneously display reduced replication fork (RF) movement and mitotic extra centrosomes. We show here that these cells present a complex mitotic phenotype, including prolonged metaphase arrest, anaphase bridges, and multipolar segregations. We then asked whether the replication and the mitotic phenotypes are interdependent. First, we determined low doses of hydroxyurea that did not affect the cell cycle distribution or activate CHK1 phosphorylation but did slow the replication fork movement of wild-type cells to the same level than in HR(-) cells. Remarkably, these low hydroxyurea doses generated the same mitotic defects (and to the same extent) in wild-type cells as observed in unchallenged HR(-) cells. Reciprocally, supplying nucleotide precursors to HR(-) cells suppressed both their replication deceleration and mitotic extra centrosome phenotypes. Therefore, subtle replication stress that escapes to surveillance pathways and, thus, fails to prevent cells from entering mitosis alters metaphase progression and centrosome number, resulting in multipolar mitosis. Importantly, multipolar mitosis results in global unbalanced chromosome segregation involving the whole genome, even fully replicated chromosomes. These data highlight the cross-talk between chromosome replication and segregation, and the importance of HR at the interface of these two processes for protection against general genome instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347643      PMCID: PMC3896206          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1311520111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  63 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and consequences of replication fork arrest.

Authors:  O Hyrien
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.079

2.  Characterization of mammalian RAD51 double strand break repair using non-lethal dominant-negative forms.

Authors:  S Lambert; B S Lopez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation.

Authors:  C S Griffin; P J Simpson; C R Wilson; J Thacker
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  B Michel; M J Flores; E Viguera; G Grompone; M Seigneur; V Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Brca2 (XRCC11) deficiency results in radioresistant DNA synthesis and a higher frequency of spontaneous deletions.

Authors:  Maria Kraakman-van der Zwet; Wilhelmina J I Overkamp; Rebecca E E van Lange; Jeroen Essers; Annemarie van Duijn-Goedhart; Ingrid Wiggers; Srividya Swaminathan; Paul P W van Buul; Abdellatif Errami; Raoul T L Tan; Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Shyam K Sharan; Roland Kanaar; Malgorzata Z Zdzienicka
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Role of RAD51 in sister-chromatid exchanges in mammalian cells.

Authors:  S Lambert; B S Lopez
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  The good, the bad and the ugly: the practical consequences of centrosome amplification.

Authors:  Greenfield Sluder; Joshua J Nordberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.382

8.  Genetic alterations in 'normal' luminal and myoepithelial cells of the breast.

Authors:  S R Lakhani; R Chaggar; S Davies; C Jones; N Collins; C Odel; M R Stratton; M J O'Hare
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  Delayed replication timing leads to delayed mitotic chromosome condensation and chromosomal instability of chromosome translocations.

Authors:  L Smith; A Plug; M Thayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Y Saintigny; F Delacôte; G Varès; F Petitot; S Lambert; D Averbeck; B S Lopez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  33 in total

1.  Rad51 recombinase prevents Mre11 nuclease-dependent degradation and excessive PrimPol-mediated elongation of nascent DNA after UV irradiation.

Authors:  María Belén Vallerga; Sabrina F Mansilla; María Belén Federico; Agustina P Bertolin; Vanesa Gottifredi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The impact of replication stress on replication dynamics and DNA damage in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Alain Nicolas; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Mild replication stress causes aneuploidy by deregulating microtubule dynamics in mitosis.

Authors:  Nicolas Böhly; Magdalena Kistner; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  The human oncoprotein and chromatin architectural factor DEK counteracts DNA replication stress.

Authors:  A Deutzmann; M Ganz; F Schönenberger; J Vervoorts; F Kappes; E Ferrando-May
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Shortage of dNTPs underlies altered replication dynamics and DNA breakage in the absence of the APC/C cofactor Cdh1.

Authors:  J Garzón; R Rodríguez; Z Kong; A Chabes; S Rodríguez-Acebes; J Méndez; S Moreno; I García-Higuera
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Near-tetraploid cancer cells show chromosome instability triggered by replication stress and exhibit enhanced invasiveness.

Authors:  Darawalee Wangsa; Isabel Quintanilla; Keyvan Torabi; Maria Vila-Casadesús; Amaia Ercilla; Gregory Klus; Zeynep Yuce; Claudia Galofré; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Juan José Lozano; Neus Agell; Daniela Cimini; Antoni Castells; Thomas Ried; Jordi Camps
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Personalised pathway analysis reveals association between DNA repair pathway dysregulation and chromosomal instability in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Sriganesh Srihari; Samir Lal; Benoît Gautier; Peter T Simpson; Kum Kum Khanna; Mark A Ragan; Kim-Anh Lê Cao
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Replication stress and cancer.

Authors:  Hélène Gaillard; Tatiana García-Muse; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  AMBRA1 regulates cyclin D to guard S-phase entry and genomic integrity.

Authors:  Emiliano Maiani; Giacomo Milletti; Francesca Nazio; Søs Grønbæk Holdgaard; Jirina Bartkova; Salvatore Rizza; Valentina Cianfanelli; Mar Lorente; Daniele Simoneschi; Miriam Di Marco; Pasquale D'Acunzo; Luca Di Leo; Rikke Rasmussen; Costanza Montagna; Marilena Raciti; Cristiano De Stefanis; Estibaliz Gabicagogeascoa; Gergely Rona; Nélida Salvador; Emanuela Pupo; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; Colin J Daniel; Marianna Carinci; Valeriana Cesarini; Alfie O'sullivan; Yeon-Tae Jeong; Matteo Bordi; Francesco Russo; Silvia Campello; Angela Gallo; Giuseppe Filomeni; Letizia Lanzetti; Rosalie C Sears; Petra Hamerlik; Armando Bartolazzi; Robert E Hynds; David R Pearce; Charles Swanton; Michele Pagano; Guillermo Velasco; Elena Papaleo; Daniela De Zio; Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Franco Locatelli; Jiri Bartek; Francesco Cecconi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  The Replication Stress Response on a Narrow Path Between Genomic Instability and Inflammation.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.