BACKGROUND: The allocation of research resources should favor conditions responsible for the greatest disease burden. This is particularly important in pediatric populations, which have been underrepresented in clinical research. Our aim was to measure the association between the focus of pediatric clinical trials and burden of disease and to identify neglected clinical domains. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of clinical trials by using trial records in ClinicalTrials.gov. All trials started in 2006 or after and studying patient-level interventions in pediatric populations were included. Age-specific measures of disease burden were obtained for 21 separate conditions for high-, middle-, and low-income countries. We measured the correlation between number of pediatric clinical trials and disease burden for each condition. RESULTS: Neuropsychiatric conditions and infectious diseases were the most studied conditions globally in terms of number of trials (874 and 847 trials, respectively), while intentional injuries (5 trials) and maternal conditions (4 trials) were the least studied. Clinical trials were only moderately correlated with global disease burden (r = 0.58, P = .006). Correlations were also moderate within each of the country income levels, but lowest in low-income countries (r = .47, P = .03). Globally, the conditions most understudied relative to disease burden were injuries (-260 trials for unintentional injuries and -160 trials for intentional injuries), nutritional deficiencies (-175 trials), and respiratory infections (-171 trials). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric clinical trial activity is only moderately associated with pediatric burden of disease, and least associated in low-income countries. The mismatch between clinical trials and disease burden identifies key clinical areas for focus and investment.
BACKGROUND: The allocation of research resources should favor conditions responsible for the greatest disease burden. This is particularly important in pediatric populations, which have been underrepresented in clinical research. Our aim was to measure the association between the focus of pediatric clinical trials and burden of disease and to identify neglected clinical domains. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of clinical trials by using trial records in ClinicalTrials.gov. All trials started in 2006 or after and studying patient-level interventions in pediatric populations were included. Age-specific measures of disease burden were obtained for 21 separate conditions for high-, middle-, and low-income countries. We measured the correlation between number of pediatric clinical trials and disease burden for each condition. RESULTS:Neuropsychiatric conditions and infectious diseases were the most studied conditions globally in terms of number of trials (874 and 847 trials, respectively), while intentional injuries (5 trials) and maternal conditions (4 trials) were the least studied. Clinical trials were only moderately correlated with global disease burden (r = 0.58, P = .006). Correlations were also moderate within each of the country income levels, but lowest in low-income countries (r = .47, P = .03). Globally, the conditions most understudied relative to disease burden were injuries (-260 trials for unintentional injuries and -160 trials for intentional injuries), nutritional deficiencies (-175 trials), and respiratory infections (-171 trials). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric clinical trial activity is only moderately associated with pediatric burden of disease, and least associated in low-income countries. The mismatch between clinical trials and disease burden identifies key clinical areas for focus and investment.
Entities:
Keywords:
burden of disease; clinical trials; pediatric research
Authors: Florence T Bourgeois; Srinivas Murthy; Catia Pinto; Karen L Olson; John P A Ioannidis; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Leslie A Gillum; Christopher Gouveia; E Ray Dorsey; Mark Pletcher; Colin D Mathers; Charles E McCulloch; S Claiborne Johnston Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel M Lindberg; Joanne N Wood; Kristine A Campbell; Philip V Scribano; Antoinette Laskey; John M Leventhal; Mary Clyde Pierce; Desmond K Runyan Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2017-02-03
Authors: Devon M Kratchman; Porcia Vaughn; Ligia Batista Silverman; Kristine A Campbell; Daniel M Lindberg; James D Anderst; Angela N Bachim; Rachel P Berger; Kent P Hymel; Megan Letson; John D Melville; Joanne N Wood Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Sze Lin Yoong; Alix Hall; Christopher M Williams; Eliza Skelton; Christopher Oldmeadow; John Wiggers; Chante Karimkhani; Lindsay N Boyers; Robert P Dellavalle; John Hilton; Luke Wolfenden Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: S S Haslund-Krog; I M Jorgensen; T B Henriksen; K Dalhoff; N M Debes; J van den Anker; H Holst Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-06-21