Literature DB >> 24338452

Patient and physician views on providing cancer patient-specific survival information.

Nancy L Solowski1, Oluwafunmilola T Okuyemi, Dorina Kallogjeri, Joyce Nicklaus, Jay F Piccirillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To gather input regarding the presentation, content, and understanding of survival and support information for Prognostigram, a computer-based program that uses standard cancer registry data elements to present individualized survival estimates. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey research.
METHODS: Two groups of patients (total n=40) and one group of physicians (n=5) were interviewed. The patient groups were interviewed to assess baseline patient numeracy and health literacy, and patient desire for prognostic information. The first group (n=20) was introduced to generalized survival curves in a paper booklet. The second group (n=20) was introduced to individualized survival curves from Prognostigram on the computer. Both patient groups were queried about the survival curves. The physicians were asked their opinions on sharing prognostic information with patients.
RESULTS: Numeracy assessments indicated that the patients are able to understand concepts and statistics presented by Prognostigram. According to the patient interviews, the Internet is the most frequent source for survival statistics. Of the 40 patient participants, 39 reported survival statistics as being somewhat or very useful to cancer patients. All five physicians believed survival statistics were useful to patients and physicians, and noted accurate and understandable survival statistics are fundamental to facilitate discussions with patients regarding prognosis and expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: Formative research indicates that cancer patients and their families actively seek survival statistics on their own. All patients indicated strong interest in Prognostigram, which is a software tool designed to produce individualized survival statistics to oncologists and cancer patients in a user-friendly manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Copyright © 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer survivorship; decision making; health literacy; numeracy; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338452      PMCID: PMC3946928          DOI: 10.1002/lary.24007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  14 in total

Review 1.  Comorbidity and functional status in older women with breast cancer: implications for screening, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  W A Satariano
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1992-11

2.  Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients' views on the disclosure of prognosis.

Authors:  Rebecca G Hagerty; Phyllis N Butow; Peter M Ellis; Elizabeth A Lobb; Susan C Pendlebury; Natasha Leighl; Craig MacLeod; Craig Mac Leod; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Anthony Viera; Karen Crotty; Audrey Holland; Michelle Brasure; Kathleen N Lohr; Elizabeth Harden; Elizabeth Tant; Ina Wallace; Meera Viswanathan
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2011-03

Review 5.  The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  T C Davis; N C Dolan; M R Ferreira; C Tomori; K W Green; A M Sipler; C L Bennett
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  Patient-physician communication in oncology: what does the evidence show?

Authors:  Anthony Back
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 7.  Health literacy and cancer communication.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Mark V Williams; Estela Marin; Ruth M Parker; Jonathan Glass
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Catharine Wang; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1970-12

Review 10.  Ethical issues in the perioperative management of neurologic patients.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.806

View more
  2 in total

1.  Disparities in Cancer Survivorship Indicators in the Deep South Based on BRFSS Data: Recommendations for Survivorship Care Plans.

Authors:  Renee A Desmond; Bradford E Jackson; John W Waterbor
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 2.  Identifying gaps in consumer health library collections: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Eleni Giannopoulos; Michelle Snow; Mollie Manley; Katie McEwan; Andrew Stechkevich; Meredith Elana Giuliani; Janet Papadakos
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.