Literature DB >> 16061891

Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?

Angela Fagerlin1, Catharine Wang, Peter A Ubel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People's treatment decisions are often influenced by anecdotal rather than statistical information. This can lead to patients making decisions based on others' experiences rather than on evidence-based medicine.
OBJECTIVE: . To test whether the use of a quiz or pictograph decreases people's reliance on anecdotal information.
DESIGN: . Two cross-sectional survey studies using hypothetical scenarios. Participants read a scenario describing angina and indicated a preference for either bypass surgery or balloon angioplasty. The cure rate of both treatments was presented using prose, a pictograph, a quiz, or a pictograph and quiz combination. Participants read anecdotes from hypothetical patients who described the outcome of their treatment; the number of successful anecdotes was either representative or unrepresentative of the cure rates. Setting and Participants. Prospective jurors at the Philadelphia County Courthouse and travelers at the Detroit-Wayne County Metropolitan Airport. Measurements. Proportion of respondents preferring bypass over balloon angioplasty.
RESULTS: . In study 1, when statistical information was presented in prose, treatment choices were influenced by anecdotes, with 41% of participants choosing bypass when the anecdotes were representative and only 20% choosing it when the anecdotes were unrepresentative (x(2) = 14.40, P < 0.001). When statistics were reinforced with the pictograph and quiz, anecdotes had no significant influence on treatment decisions (38% choosing bypass when anecdotes were representative v. 44% when unrepresentative, x(2) = 1.08, P > 0.20). In study 2, the tradeoff quiz did not reduce the impact of the anecdotes (27% v. 28% choosing bypass after receiving or not receiving the quiz, x(2) < 1, P > 0.20). However, the pictograph significantly reduced the impact of anecdotes, with 27% choosing bypass after receiving no pictograph and 40% choosing bypass after receiving a pictograph (x(2) = 6.44, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: . Presenting statistical information using a pictograph can reduce the undue influence of anecdotal reasoning on treatment choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16061891     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05278931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  90 in total

1.  Consumers' use of HCAHPS ratings and word-of-mouth in hospital choice.

Authors:  John W Huppertz; Jay P Carlson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Kathryn J Aikin; Dhuly Chowdhury; Rebecca R Moultrie; Douglas J Rupert
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-12-22

3.  Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.

Authors:  Ishani Saraswat; Robert Abouassaly; Peter Dwyer; Damien M Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Rethinking health numeracy: a multidisciplinary literature review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; David Kaufman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Using stories to disseminate research: the attributes of representative stories.

Authors:  John F Steiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  An encounter frequency account of how experience affects likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Natalie A Obrecht; Gretchen B Chapman; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07

7.  Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ellen M Peters; Laura Siminoff; E Dale Collins; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Andy S L Tan; Daniel D Matlock; Barry Saver; Kathleen M Mazor; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  News coverage of FDA warnings on pediatric antidepressant use and suicidality.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Susan H Busch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Peer-to-peer communication, cancer prevention, and the internet.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Kristen M Carpenter; Paul Greene; Randi Hoffman; Rita Kukafka; Laura A V Marlow; Holly G Prigerson; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.