Literature DB >> 24337915

Objective analysis of surgeons' ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove.

F J Pérez-Duarte1, M Lucas-Hernández, A Matos-Azevedo, J A Sánchez-Margallo, I Díaz-Güemes, F M Sánchez-Margallo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adding to the ergonomic inconveniences already presented by traditional laparoscopy (LAP), laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery has been found to entail other more specific problems, including greater reduction in movement freedom, in-line vision with loss of triangulation, and greater proximity of instruments. The objective of this study was to evaluate surgeons' ergonomy during LESS surgery, through the study of muscular activity, wrist angle, and hand movements, and compare it with conventional laparoscopy.
METHODS: The study group was composed by 14 experienced laparoscopic surgeons, all right-handed. Each one performed dissection tasks on a physical simulator through LAP and LESS approaches. For LAP, straight laparoscopic scissors and dissector were used, whilst for LESS articulating tip scissors and dissector were chosen. During both tasks, muscular activity of biceps brachii, triceps brachii, forearm flexors and extensors, and trapezius muscles was registered through surface electromyography. Simultaneously right-hand movements and wrist angles were obtained through a motion capture data glove (CyberGlove(®)), which allowed for the use of a modified RULA test applied to the recorded angles with subsequent establishment of risk levels for the wrist joint.
RESULTS: Muscular activity for trapezius (LAP 6.94 ± 4.12 vs. LESS 11.32 ± 4.68; p ≤ 0.05) and forearm extensor muscles (LAP 9.2 ± 2.45 vs. LESS 37.07 ≤ 16.05; p ≤ 0.001) was significantly lower in conventional laparoscopy compared with LESS approach. No statistical significance was obtained between the different sensors, except in 3 of the 11 analyzed CyberGlove(®) sensors. The modified RULA test showed a score of 3 for laparoscopy (unacceptable), whereas for LESS a score of 2 was obtained (acceptable), with statistically significant differences between them (p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The LESS approach entails greater level of muscular activity in the trapezius and forearm extensor muscles, but we have found evidences of a better wrist position during LESS compared with traditional laparoscopy.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337915     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3334-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  26 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Virtual Instrumentation (VI) Laboratory facilitates customized on-site ergonomic analysis of minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  W D Smith; D L Forkey; R Berguer
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

3.  A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques.

Authors:  Ramon Berguer; Jerry Chen; Warren D Smith
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09

Review 4.  Ergonomics of and technologies for single-port lapaxroscopic surgery.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Sichuan Hou; Sir Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 5.  [Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery and its importance in surgical training].

Authors:  Francisco Julián Pérez-Duarte; Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo; Idoia Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugués; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Hurtado; Marcos Lucas-Hernández; Jesús Usón Gargallo
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.653

6.  Comparison between magnetic anchoring and guidance system camera-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in a porcine model: focus on ergonomics and workload profiles.

Authors:  Woong Kyu Han; Yung K Tan; Ephrem O Olweny; Gang Yin; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Stephen Faddegon; Daniel J Scott; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) in vivo suturing using a magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS) camera in a porcine model: impact on ergonomics and workload.

Authors:  Gang Yin; Woong Kyu Han; Stephen Faddegon; Yung Khan Tan; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Ephrem O Olweny; Daniel J Scott; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Learning Center study.

Authors:  Arsalla Islam; Antonio O Castellvi; Seifu T Tesfay; Alejandro D Castellvi; Andrew S Wright; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Novel magnetically guided intra-abdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cadeddu; Raul Fernandez; Mihir Desai; Richard Bergs; Chad Tracy; Shou-Jiang Tang; Prashanth Rao; Mahesh Desai; Daniel Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Single access site laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Lee E Ponsky; Edward E Cherullo; Mark Sawyer; David Hartke
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  10 in total

1.  Achieving the "Minimal Scarring" Concept in Bariatrics by Port-Site Relocation.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; Lior Segev; Chanan Meydan; Rachel Yosef; Itai Ronen; Lior Heller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions: an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study.

Authors:  Fabiola Fernández-Gutiérrez; Santiago Martínez; Martin A Rube; Benjamin F Cox; Mahsa Fatahi; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; J Graeme Houston; Helen McLeod; Richard D White; Karen French; Mariana Gueorguieva; Erwin Immel; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  An Objective Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Surgeons in Real Time While Performing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Twinkle Dabholkar; Yogesh G Dabholkar; Sujata Yardi; Jyotika Sethi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-07

4.  Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.

Authors:  Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Development of an arm support system to improve ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery: study design and provisional results.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinhilber; Sascha Hoffmann; Kristian Karlovic; Stefan Pfeffer; Thomas Maier; Omar Hallasheh; Stephan Kruck; Robert Seibt; Monika A Rieger; Michael Heidingsfeld; Ronny Feuer; Oliver Sawodny; Ralf Rothmund; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between laparoendoscopic single-site and three-portal access.

Authors:  Angelo E Tapia-Araya; Idoia Díaz-Güemes Martin-Portugués; Laura Fresno Bermejo; Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.672

7.  Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranavolo Alberto; Francesco Draicchio; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde; Andrea Peeters; Yannick M Meyer; Stavros A Antoniou; Isaías Alarcón Del Agua; Alberto Arezzo; Simone Arolfo; Amir Ben Yehuda; Luigi Boni; Elisa Cassinotti; Giovanni Dapri; Tao Yang; Sofie Fransen; Antonello Forgione; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Michele Mazzola; Marco Migliore; Christof Mittermair; Doris Mittermair; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Andrea Morlacchi; Eran Nizri; Myrthe Nuijts; Jonas Raakow; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Amir Szold; Helmut Weiss; Michael Weiss; Ricardo Zorron; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Study of Individual Characteristic Abdominal Wall Thickness Based on Magnetic Anchored Surgical Instruments.

Authors:  Ding-Hui Dong; Wen-Yan Liu; Hai-Bo Feng; Yi-Li Fu; Shi Huang; Jun-Xi Xiang; Yi Lyu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Evaluating Swine Injection Technologies as a Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Intervention: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Catherine Trask; Brenna Bath; Stephan Milosavljevic; Aaron M Kociolek; Bernardo Predicala; Erika Penz; Olugbenga Adebayo; Lee Whittington
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.