Literature DB >> 12963653

A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques.

Ramon Berguer1, Jerry Chen, Warren D Smith.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Performing complex tasks requires greater muscle effort with laparoscopic instruments than with open surgical instruments.
DESIGN: A nonrandomized 2-condition trial.
SETTING: A semienclosed ergonomics station in the exhibit hall at the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-one surgeons volunteered to participate in the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Knot tying during 90 seconds, performed first using a laparoscopic technique (ie, axial instruments in a standard laparoscopic trainer) and then using an open technique (ie, 2 hemostats). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean and peak surface electromyographic (EMG) signals collected from the thenar compartment, the flexor digitorum superficialis, and the deltoid muscles of the dominant arm.
RESULTS: Compared with open knot-tying, laparoscopic tasks resulted in higher average EMG amplitudes in all 3 muscles (thumb, P =.02; forearm flexor, P =.01; and deltoid, P =.01) and higher peak EMG in the thumb (P =.04) and deltoid (P =.02) muscles. Body part discomfort scores were significantly higher during laparoscopic knot-tying for the forearm flexor and deltoid muscles (P =.02 for both).
CONCLUSION: Complex manipulative tasks using laparoscopic techniques require substantially higher upper-extremity muscle effort compared with open surgical techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12963653     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  23 in total

1.  Workload assessment of surgeons: correlation between NASA TLX and blinks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xianta Jiang; Geoffrey Tien; Adam Meneghetti; O Neely M Panton; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Georg O Spaun; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Objective analysis of surgeons' ergonomy during laparoendoscopic single-site surgery through the use of surface electromyography and a motion capture data glove.

Authors:  F J Pérez-Duarte; M Lucas-Hernández; A Matos-Azevedo; J A Sánchez-Margallo; I Díaz-Güemes; F M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Higher physical workload risks with NOTES versus laparoscopy: a quantitative ergonomic assessment.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Erica Sutton; Tameka Clanton; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Advances in suture material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  James A Greenberg; Rachel M Clark
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position.

Authors:  Yassar Youssef; Gyusung Lee; Carlos Godinez; Erica Sutton; Rosemary V Klein; Ivan M George; F Jacob Seagull; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The use of barbed sutures in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

8.  Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?

Authors:  Robert Wang; Zhe Liang; Ahmed M Zihni; Shuddhadeb Ray; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynecologists.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Hye-Chun Hur; Susan Johnson; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure?

Authors:  Jon R Pluyter; Sonja N Buzink; Anne-F Rutkowski; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.