INTRODUCTION: Gliomas remain difficult to treat, in part, due to our inability to accurately delineate the margins of the tumor. The goal of our study was to evaluate if a combination of advanced MR imaging techniques and a multimodal imaging model could be used to predict tumor infiltration in patients with diffuse gliomas. METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written consent were obtained. This prospective pilot study enrolled patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy for a suspected de novo glioma. Stereotactic biopsy coordinates were coregistered with multiple standard and advanced neuroimaging sequences in 10 patients. Objective imaging values were assigned to the biopsy sites for each of the imaging sequences. A principal component analysis was performed to reduce the dimensionality of the imaging dataset without losing important information. A univariate analysis was performed to identify the statistically relevant principal components. Finally, a multivariate analysis was used to build the final model describing nuclear density. RESULTS: A univariate analysis identified three principal components as being linearly associated with the observed nuclear density (p values 0.021, 0.016, and 0.046, respectively). These three principal component composite scores are predominantly comprised of DTI (mean diffusivity or average diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy) and PWI data (rMTT, Ktrans). The p value of the model was <0.001. The correlation between the predicted and observed nuclear density was 0.75. CONCLUSION: A multi-input, single output imaging model may predict the extent of glioma invasion with significant correlation with histopathology.
INTRODUCTION:Gliomas remain difficult to treat, in part, due to our inability to accurately delineate the margins of the tumor. The goal of our study was to evaluate if a combination of advanced MR imaging techniques and a multimodal imaging model could be used to predict tumor infiltration in patients with diffuse gliomas. METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written consent were obtained. This prospective pilot study enrolled patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy for a suspected de novo glioma. Stereotactic biopsy coordinates were coregistered with multiple standard and advanced neuroimaging sequences in 10 patients. Objective imaging values were assigned to the biopsy sites for each of the imaging sequences. A principal component analysis was performed to reduce the dimensionality of the imaging dataset without losing important information. A univariate analysis was performed to identify the statistically relevant principal components. Finally, a multivariate analysis was used to build the final model describing nuclear density. RESULTS: A univariate analysis identified three principal components as being linearly associated with the observed nuclear density (p values 0.021, 0.016, and 0.046, respectively). These three principal component composite scores are predominantly comprised of DTI (mean diffusivity or average diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy) and PWI data (rMTT, Ktrans). The p value of the model was <0.001. The correlation between the predicted and observed nuclear density was 0.75. CONCLUSION: A multi-input, single output imaging model may predict the extent of glioma invasion with significant correlation with histopathology.
Authors: H Uematsu; M Maeda; N Sadato; T Matsuda; Y Ishimori; Y Koshimoto; H Yamada; H Kimura; Y Kawamura; T Matsuda; N Hayashi; Y Yonekura; Y Ishii Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Soonmee Cha; Edmond A Knopp; Glyn Johnson; Stephan G Wetzel; Andrew W Litt; David Zagzag Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Heidi C Roberts; Timothy P L Roberts; Sebastian Ley; William P Dillon; Robert C Brasch Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: David Mattes; David R Haynor; Hubert Vesselle; Thomas K Lewellen; William Eubank Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Ramon F Barajas; Joanna J Phillips; Rupa Parvataneni; Annette Molinaro; Emma Essock-Burns; Gabriela Bourne; Andrew T Parsa; Manish K Aghi; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: N Sadeghi; N D'Haene; C Decaestecker; M Levivier; T Metens; C Maris; D Wikler; D Baleriaux; I Salmon; S Goldman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-12-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E D H Gates; J S Lin; J S Weinberg; S S Prabhu; J Hamilton; J D Hazle; G N Fuller; V Baladandayuthapani; D T Fuentes; D Schellingerhout Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L S Hu; H Yoon; J M Eschbacher; L C Baxter; A C Dueck; A Nespodzany; K A Smith; P Nakaji; Y Xu; L Wang; J P Karis; A J Hawkins-Daarud; K W Singleton; P R Jackson; B J Anderies; B R Bendok; R S Zimmerman; C Quarles; A B Porter-Umphrey; M M Mrugala; A Sharma; J M Hoxworth; M G Sattur; N Sanai; P E Koulemberis; C Krishna; J R Mitchell; T Wu; N L Tran; K R Swanson; J Li Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; K L Shrinidhi; Max Wintermark; Christopher R Durst; Benjamin M Kandel; James C Gee; Murray C Grossman; Brian B Avants Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2015-04
Authors: Evan D H Gates; Jonathan S Lin; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Jackson Hamilton; Sujit S Prabhu; John D Hazle; Gregory N Fuller; Veera Baladandayuthapani; David Fuentes; Dawid Schellingerhout Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: E D H Gates; J S Weinberg; S S Prabhu; J S Lin; J Hamilton; J D Hazle; G N Fuller; V Baladandayuthapani; D T Fuentes; D Schellingerhout Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.825